History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jamar Washington v. State of Indiana
973 N.E.2d 91
Ind. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Washington injured police officers and wrestled onlookers during a club-altercation with Brown and Crayton; five officers restrained him.
  • Brown, Washington’s live-in girlfriend, arrived at the club with their eight-month-old to confront Washington after a Facebook message with another woman’s photo surfaced.
  • Brown hit Washington and Crayton; Washington attempted to break up the fight and was later accused of resisting officers.
  • Officers Young, Barbieri, and Weilhamer attempted to restrain Washington, who caused Weilhamer to concussion and was kicked by Barbieri.
  • State charged Washington with multiple felonies and a misdemeanor; defense sought a jury instruction on defense of another person.
  • Trial court gave a pattern defense-of-another instruction; Washington requested two additional instructions which were refused; the jury convicted on lesser-included offenses.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the jury was properly instructed on defense of another person. State concedes instruction 3 correct; instruction 4 contested. Washington argued two extra instructions were necessary. No abuse; pattern instruction adequate; remanded for corrected abstract of judgment.

Key Cases Cited

  • Franklin v. State, 266 Ind. 540 (Ind. 1977) (defense-of-another law language cited as correct but sufficiency not on point for instructions)
  • Ludy v. State, 784 N.E.2d 459 (Ind. 2003) (language not automatically instructional for juries despite appellate use)
  • French v. State, 273 Ind. 251 (Ind. 1980) (instruction inadequate for failing to explain reasonable belief and judging from defendant’s viewpoint)
  • Shaw v. State, 534 N.E.2d 745 (Ind. 1989) (jury may rely on reasonable belief standard; supports sufficiency of pattern instruction)
  • Davis v. State, 691 N.E.2d 1285 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998) (approval of pattern self-defense instruction identical in relevant respects)
  • Gravens v. State, 836 N.E.2d 490 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) (prefers pattern instructions but requires careful comparison to French)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Jamar Washington v. State of Indiana
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 28, 2012
Citation: 973 N.E.2d 91
Docket Number: 49A02-1202-CR-79
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.