History
  • No items yet
midpage
20 F.4th 337
7th Cir.
2021
Read the full case

Background

  • Jacqueline Stevens, a Northwestern political‑science professor, filed three FOIA requests in Feb 2015: Northwestern (Req. 3180), Campuses (Req. 3181), and USAID/MEPI (Req. 3575).
  • The State Department produced hundreds of records responsive to the Northwestern request, some responsive to USAID/MEPI, and none for the Campuses request; it also withheld certain documents.
  • The parties agreed early that Stevens would provide keywords to prioritize a large set of potentially responsive Northwestern documents; the Department used that keyword filter and produced bulk results in 2018.
  • Stevens sued in March 2017 alleging inadequate searches and improper withholdings; the district court granted summary judgment for the Department but ordered two limited follow‑up searches, after which final judgment entered.
  • On appeal Stevens argued searches were inadequate and exemptions were misapplied (Exemptions 1, 3, and 5); the Seventh Circuit reviewed search adequacy de novo and reviewed withholdings under its two‑step FOIA withholding review and affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Adequacy of State Dept. searches Stevens: searches omitted likely repositories and declaration lacked detail; keyword filtering was only for prioritization, not limitation State: searches were reasonable, adequately documented by Stein declaration, and Stevens acquiesced to keyword filtering Court: search was adequate; Stevens waived late objection to keyword filtering and affidavit provided sufficient detail
Timeliness / keyword agreement Stevens: September 2018 objection that keyword use improperly limited search State: parties had agreed to keyword prioritization and Stevens did not timely object Court: district court did not abuse docket‑management discretion; Stevens’s late objection was untimely and acquiescence is considered in adequacy review
Exemption 1 (national security/classification) Stevens: challenged Executive Order 13,526 and some classifications as overbroad State: withheld properly classified materials per EO 13,526; Vaughn index and in camera review supported harms asserted Court: upheld Exemption 1 withholdings as adequately justified in Vaughn index and affidavits
Exemption 3 (statutory withholding re: visas) Stevens: documents withheld under 5 U.S.C. §552(b)(3) and 8 U.S.C. §1202(f) do not pertain to past or pending visa requests State: withheld items plainly relate to visa issuance/refusal (e.g., "Help with U.S. Visa" emails) Court: upheld statutory withholding; documents met the relevant statutory scope
Exemption 5 (deliberative‑process privilege) Stevens: cables are final agency action and thus not deliberative; privilege limited to policy formation or adjudication State: withheld predecisional, deliberative drafts, agendas, and emails protected by deliberative‑process privilege Court: upheld Exemption 5 withholdings; cables can be deliberative and privilege applies to predecisional internal communications

Key Cases Cited

  • Vaughn v. Rosen, 484 F.2d 820 (D.C. Cir. 1973) (establishes Vaughn index practice for FOIA withholdings)
  • Rubman v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 800 F.3d 381 (7th Cir. 2015) (standard for adequacy of agency FOIA searches)
  • Henson v. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 892 F.3d 868 (7th Cir. 2018) (two‑step approach to reviewing FOIA withholdings and affidavit sufficiency)
  • Keeton v. Morningstar, Inc., 667 F.3d 877 (7th Cir. 2012) (district courts’ broad docket‑management discretion)
  • Enviro Tech Int’l, Inc. v. EPA, 371 F.3d 370 (7th Cir. 2004) (deliberative‑process privilege explained in FOIA context)
  • Becker v. IRS, 34 F.3d 398 (7th Cir. 1994) (district courts suited for comprehensive record‑by‑record FOIA withholding review)
  • U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv. v. Sierra Club, 141 S. Ct. 777 (2021) (discusses predecisional and deliberative materials)
  • Puffer v. Allstate Ins. Co., 675 F.3d 709 (7th Cir. 2012) (failure to raise argument below waives it on appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Jacqueline Stevens v. United States Department of S
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date Published: Dec 9, 2021
Citations: 20 F.4th 337; 20-3504
Docket Number: 20-3504
Court Abbreviation: 7th Cir.
Log In
    Jacqueline Stevens v. United States Department of S, 20 F.4th 337