History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jacobitz v. Aurora Co-op
865 N.W.2d 353
Neb.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Aurora Cooperative’s Ong location hosted a vendor‑sponsored customer appreciation supper at a community building; 17 customers were invited and ~12 attended.
  • Six Ong employees (including John Jacobitz, a temporary part‑time general laborer) were invited; attendance was permissive though invitations were sent on company letterhead and some setup occurred during work hours.
  • Jacobitz clocked out, went home, returned for the supper, did not serve or clearly interact with customers (testimony conflicted); he helped deliver invitations and helped set up earlier in the day.
  • After the supper, employees assisted briefly with the vendor’s smoker: Jacobitz sprayed out the smoker and later rode in the bed of a coworker’s truck, fell from the truck on a public street, and sustained head injuries.
  • Workers’ Compensation Court found the injury arose in the course of employment, reasoning the Co‑op received a “substantial benefit” from Jacobitz’s attendance and assistance; the trial bifurcated liability and damages; the Supreme Court reversed and remanded for application of the correct standard.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether injury arose "out of and in the course of employment" for a social/recreational activity Jacobitz: attendance and brief customer contact benefitted employer; injury occurred while engaged in activity tied to work Co‑op: any benefit was not a "substantial direct benefit"; attendance was permissive and not required Court: Reversed — trial court applied wrong standard (used "substantial benefit"); remanded to assess whether Co‑op derived a "substantial direct benefit"

Key Cases Cited

  • Gray v. State, 205 Neb. 853 (Neb. 1979) (social events not within course of employment when employer did not benefit directly and substantially)
  • Shade v. Ayars & Ayars, Inc., 247 Neb. 94 (Neb. 1994) (company picnic did not confer a substantial direct benefit to employer)
  • Miller v. Regional West Med. Ctr., 278 Neb. 676 (Neb. 2009) (framework for evaluating recreational/social activities under workers’ compensation law)
  • Torres v. Aulick Leasing, 261 Neb. 1016 (Neb. 2001) (application of course‑of‑employment tests to social/recreational events)
  • Davis v. Crete Carrier Corp., 274 Neb. 362 (Neb. 2007) (precedent on injuries during non‑work activities tied to employment)
  • Jacobitz v. Aurora Co‑op, 287 Neb. 97 (Neb. 2013) (prior appellate disposition holding initial liability order nonfinal and remanding)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Jacobitz v. Aurora Co-op
Court Name: Nebraska Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 10, 2015
Citation: 865 N.W.2d 353
Docket Number: S-14-903
Court Abbreviation: Neb.