Jackson v. State
148 A.3d 95
| Md. Ct. Spec. App. | 2016Background
- On Sept. 1, 2014, after a family birthday party at the Evans/Wilson home, an altercation occurred between Larry Jackson (appellant) and his girlfriend Shakeara Wilson, who was pregnant with his child; Jackson admitted striking her.
- Family members confronted Jackson; one punched him and a gunshot was fired into the basement ceiling; shell casing recovered was fired from a 9mm not matching the recovered Taurus found in the house.
- Police recovered a gun (with Evans’s DNA), a shell casing, and other items; firearms examiner concluded the recovered gun did not fire the casing.
- Jackson was convicted by a jury of one count of second-degree assault and acquitted of more serious charges; he was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment.
- On appeal Jackson raised three principal claims: (1) erroneous admission of other-crimes evidence under Md. Rule 5-404(b); (2) trial court abused discretion in denying his mistrial motion after a detective referenced a homicide investigation; and (3) sentencing court improperly considered a murder charge for which he had been acquitted.
Issues
| Issue | Jackson's Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Admission of prior domestic-abuse testimony under Rule 5-404(b) | Testimony that Jackson had a violent history with Shakeara was impermissible other-crimes evidence and unduly prejudicial | Prior abuse evidence was admissible to show motive (continuing hostility); any error harmless because Jackson admitted striking Shakeara and photos and conviction limited to 2nd-degree assault | Evidence properly admitted as motive; trial court did not abuse discretion; any error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt |
| Detective's testimony implying homicide investigation; waiver and scope | Reference to homicide investigation and homicide-unit assignment unfairly prejudiced jury and was beyond scope of cross | Detective’s homicide-unit status and other investigations were elicited earlier without objection; any single reference was struck and sustained so no prejudice | Objections largely waived by prior unobjected testimony; single stricken reference did not warrant mistrial; no reversible prejudice |
| Sentencing consideration of acquitted murder charge | Trial court impermissibly considered Jackson’s acquittal for murder when imposing sentence | Court may consider reliable evidence about uncharged/acquitted conduct (Henry); prosecutor chose not to proffer such evidence and court relied on convictions and record | No indication sentencing court relied on the acquittal; sentence affirmed as within discretion |
Key Cases Cited
- Snyder v. State, 361 Md. 580 (2000) (sets three-part test and discusses admissibility of other-crimes evidence and motive exception)
- Ross v. State, 276 Md. 664 (1976) (framework for other-crimes evidence exceptions)
- Faulkner v. State, 314 Md. 630 (1989) (discusses Ross framework and admissibility standards)
- Henry v. State, 273 Md. 131 (1974) (sentencing judge may consider evidence related to crimes for which defendant was acquitted)
