History
  • No items yet
midpage
68 So. 3d 709
Miss. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Jackson was convicted in Harrison County Circuit Court of murder with a life sentence.
  • He stabbed Neco Strickland, the man his wife Angela was having an affair with, outside a Harrison County convenience store after learning of the infidelity.
  • DNA testing linked Strickland’s blood to the knife, Jackson’s clothes, and his car; Strickland died from the stab wounds.
  • Jackson claimed he could not control himself and had a blackout during the attack; witnesses described a brutal, extended stabbing.
  • The jury were given multiple instructions on deliberate design and heat of passion; Jackson objected to the deliberate-design instruction and proposed a cooling-off instruction.
  • The State impeached a defense witness (Terry King) with a prior conviction, and the circuit court ruled; Jackson challenged the jury instructions, the impeachment, and sufficiency/weight of the evidence on appeal, which the Mississippi Court of Appeals affirmed

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the jury instructions properly explained deliberate design and heat of passion Jackson argues S-9 and D-10 improperly framed deliberate design and cooling-off. State contends S-9 correctly defines deliberate design and D-10 is duplicative and improper. No reversible error; instructions adequately conveyed law and did not confuse the jurors.
Whether impeachment of a defense witness with a prior conviction was reversible error King’s conviction details were improperly used to impeach credibility. Rule 609 allows impeachment of non-party witnesses; any error was harmless. Harmless error; the impeachment was within Rule 609 and not reversible.
Whether the evidence supports a murder conviction beyond a reasonable doubt The State proved deliberate design via the attack and weapon use. Jackson’s blackout and lack of control precluded deliberate design. Evidence was sufficient; reasonable jurors could find deliberate design beyond a reasonable doubt.

Key Cases Cited

  • Jones v. State, 904 So.2d 149 (Miss. 2005) (standard for sufficiency of evidence and deliberate design)
  • Gossett v. State, 660 So.2d 1285 (Miss. 1995) (definition of deliberate design)
  • Haley v. State, 85 So. 129 (Miss. 1920) ( Hailey language cited on cooling-off duration (Wharton reference))
  • Windham v. State, 520 So.2d 123 (Miss. 1987) (definition of deliberate design and cooling-off concepts)
  • Brown v. State, 965 So.2d 1023 (Miss. 2007) (deliberate design may be inferred from instrument used to kill)
  • Carter v. State, 722 So.2d 1258 (Miss. 1998) (deliberate design definitions in instruction)
  • Wilson v. State, 936 So.2d 357 (Miss. 2006) (deliberate design evidence considerations)
  • Young v. State, 731 So.2d 1145 (Miss. 1999) (impeachment of non-party witness Rule 609 balancing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Jackson v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Date Published: Mar 1, 2011
Citations: 68 So. 3d 709; 2011 WL 692916; 2011 Miss. App. LEXIS 109; 2009-KA-01799-COA
Docket Number: 2009-KA-01799-COA
Court Abbreviation: Miss. Ct. App.
Log In