History
  • No items yet
midpage
282 So.3d 721
Miss. Ct. App.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Raymond L. Gates, a 56-year-old former tractor driver, suffered a compensable work-related back injury and reached maximum medical improvement (MMI) on July 13, 2015.
  • Treating physician Dr. Rahul Vohra assigned permanent light-duty restrictions (lifting up to 30 lbs rarely, 20 lbs occasionally) and a 7% whole-body impairment; an independent evaluator, Dr. Howard Katz, opined Gates could perform medium-duty work but agreed to a 7% impairment.
  • Vocational expert Angela Malone calculated Gates’s loss of access to the labor market as 74% under light-duty restrictions and 17% under medium-duty restrictions; Gates applied for work without success and thereafter obtained Social Security Disability.
  • The administrative judge (AJ) found a 75% loss of wage-earning capacity and awarded permanent partial disability (PPD) benefits of $359.02/week for 450 weeks; the Mississippi Workers’ Compensation Commission affirmed.
  • Employer appealed the loss-of-wage-earning-capacity calculation and the medical-restriction findings; Gates cross-appealed, arguing he was permanently totally disabled (PTD) and challenging Malone’s deposition, report, and testimony.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Gates) Defendant's Argument (Itta Bena / Benchmark) Held
Whether the AJ erred in calculating loss of wage-earning capacity Gates argued the Commission improperly equated loss of wage-earning capacity with loss of access to the labor market and disregarded vocational testimony Employer argued the AJ ignored Malone’s vocational testimony and miscalculated loss of wage-earning capacity Affirmed: AJ and Commission considered Malone’s testimony plus the record; 75% loss supported by substantial evidence
Proper interpretation of medical evidence and work restrictions Gates contended treating physician’s restrictions showed greater impairment supporting higher award Employer relied on IME (Dr. Katz) and Malone’s view that restrictions allowed medium-duty work Affirmed: Commission credited treating physician (Dr. Vohra) over IME; substantial evidence supports light-duty restriction finding
Whether Gates proved permanent total disability (PTD) and whether presumption was rebutted Gates argued he made a prima facie showing of PTD by seeking work and failing to obtain it Employer argued it rebutted the PTD presumption by presenting evidence (Malone) that Gates remained employable Affirmed: AJ found presumption rebutted; substantial evidence supports denial of PTD
Admissibility and use of Malone’s deposition and supplemental report Gates argued deposition should be excluded and supplemental report stricken (denying opportunity to cross-examine) Employer obtained AJ permission to take deposition due to unavailability and updated Malone’s report to reflect stipulated average weekly wage Affirmed: Commission did not abuse discretion; deposition admissible and updated report permissibly considered

Key Cases Cited

  • Mitchell Buick, Pontiac & Equipment Co. v. Cash, 592 So. 2d 978 (Miss. 1991) (substantial-evidence standard for review of Commission findings)
  • Natchez Equipment Co. Inc. v. Gibbs, 623 So. 2d 270 (Miss. 1993) (Workers’ Compensation Commission is ultimate fact-finder)
  • Mont.’s Sea Kettle Restaurant v. Jones, 766 So. 2d 100 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000) (review limited to errors of law or unsupportable findings of fact)
  • Moore’s Feed Store Inc. v. Hurd, 100 So. 3d 1011 (Miss. Ct. App. 2012) (when Commission adopts AJ findings, they stand as Commission’s findings)
  • Bryan Foods Inc. v. White, 913 So. 2d 1003 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005) (loss of wage-earning capacity is largely a factual determination for the Commission)
  • Airtran Inc. v. Byrd, 953 So. 2d 296 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007) (factors for determining loss of wage-earning capacity include pre-injury wages and post-injury capacity)
  • Neshoba County General Hosp. v. Howell, 999 So. 2d 1295 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009) (Commission must consider evidence as a whole, including loss of access to job market)
  • Raytheon Aerospace Support Services v. Miller, 861 So. 2d 330 (Miss. 2003) (Commission resolves conflicts in medical testimony)
  • Choctaw Resort Dev. Enter. v. Applequist, 161 So. 3d 1134 (Miss. Ct. App. 2015) (Commission judges witness credibility and resolves evidentiary conflicts)
  • Howard Industries Inc. v. Satcher, 183 So. 3d 907 (Miss. Ct. App. 2016) (prima facie showing for PTD requires seeking work and inability to obtain it)
  • Lott v. Hudspeth Center, 26 So. 3d 1044 (Miss. 2010) (once prima facie PTD shown, burden shifts to employer to rebut)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Itta Bena Plantation III v. Raymond L. Gates
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Date Published: Aug 13, 2019
Citations: 282 So.3d 721; 2018-WC-00958-COA
Docket Number: 2018-WC-00958-COA
Court Abbreviation: Miss. Ct. App.
Log In
    Itta Bena Plantation III v. Raymond L. Gates, 282 So.3d 721