History
  • No items yet
midpage
708 S.E.2d 435
Va. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Isaac was convicted of aggravated involuntary manslaughter under Code § 18.2-36.1(A),(B) after a DUI-related collision.
  • BAC tests showed 0.16% and 0.14%; the Commonwealth introduced the 0.16% certificate, and Isaac offered the 0.14% certificate in his case in chief.
  • Trooper Daly obtained hospital warrants and custody was maintained around Isaac during hospitalization; Isaac was later transferred to jail eight days after hospitalization.
  • Isaac moved to suppress the 0.16% BAC certificate, arguing lack of probable cause for the arrest; the trial court denied.
  • Isaac argued a separate in limine ground that Bristol v. Commonwealth precluded arrest in the hospital; the court rejected that concern in a letter opinion.
  • The jury was instructed to consider both BAC certificates and the 0.14% certificate was introduced as evidence in Isaac's case in chief.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Waiver of objection to BAC evidence Isaac contends the 0.16% BAC certificate should be excluded. Commonwealth argues no waiver because prior objection remains unresolved. Waived; Isaac introduced substantially similar evidence in his case in chief.
Scope of same-evidence waiver Waiver should not apply to the 0.14% certificate offered by Isaac as rebuttal. Waiver extends to evidence of the same subject; the 0.14% certificate is the same evidence. Waiver applies; the 0.14% certificate is substantially similar and addressed the same subject.

Key Cases Cited

  • Pettus v. Gottfried, 269 Va. 69 (Va. 2005) (waiver when party introduces same evidence in chief)
  • Drinkard-Nuckols v. Andrews, 269 Va. 93 (Va. 2005) (same-evidence waiver principle applies)
  • Combs v. Norfolk & W. Ry., 256 Va. 490 (Va. 1998) (waiver depends on same-character evidence)
  • Hubbard v. Commonwealth, 243 Va. 1 (Va. 1992) ( Miranda/objective waiver context)
  • Saunders v. Commonwealth, 211 Va. 399 (Va. 1970) (evidentiary waiver principles)
  • Bristol v. Commonwealth, 272 Va. 568 (Va. 2006) (arrest in hospital context and probable cause)
  • Snead v. Commonwealth, 138 Va. 787 (Va. 1924) (limited rebuttal exception to waiver)
  • Snarr v. Commonwealth, 131 Va. 814 (Va. 1919) (waiver when fully related prior to objection)
  • Hutchinson v. Commonwealth, 133 Va. 710 (Va. 1922) (waiver through subsequent testimony)
  • Moore Lumber Corp. v. Walker, 110 Va. 775 (Va. 1910) (testimony effect on waiver)
  • Bynum v. Commonwealth, 28 Va.App. 451 (Va. App. 1998) (waiver when same evidence is introduced)
  • Taliaferro v. New York Life Ins. Co., 95 Va. 522 (Va. 1898) (harmless-error consideration in waiver)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Isaac v. Commonwealth
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Date Published: May 10, 2011
Citations: 708 S.E.2d 435; 2011 Va. App. LEXIS 164; 58 Va. App. 255; 0669104
Docket Number: 0669104
Court Abbreviation: Va. Ct. App.
Log In