History
  • No items yet
midpage
821 N.W.2d 415
Iowa
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Sara Kersenbrock, Iowa attorney, faced disciplinary action based on an audit of her trust accounting and recordkeeping.
  • Brinkmeyer’s audit found she failed to deposit retainers into a client trust account and lacked regular reconciliations and client balances.
  • Anderson testified retainers were often deposited into Kersenbrock’s operating account or paid in cash; some cash retainers were kept on hand or spent.
  • In the Schoonover probate matter, Kersenbrock collected the full second-half probate fee before the final report was filed.
  • The Grievance Commission recommended a public reprimand; this court conducted de novo review and suspended the license for 30 days.
  • The Board alleged violations of multiple rules of professional conduct related to trust accounting, records, fees, and misrepresentation.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Trust account deposits violated 32:1.15(c)? Board: Stanek and Harding retainers not deposited; funds mismanaged. Kersenbrock: fees earned; deposits unnecessary. Violation proven for Stanek and Harding matters.
Adequacy of trust records violated 32:1.15(a)/(f) and 45.2(2)? Board: records nearly non-existent; unable to reconcile accounts. Kersenbrock: improving procedures; earlier deficiencies only. Violation proven; recordkeeping deficient.
Premature probate fee violated 32:1.5(a)? Board: second-half probate fee collected before final report. Kersenbrock: fee advanced with a colorable claim; final report soon after. Violation proven.
Misrepresentation via annual trust accounting certs 32:8.4(c)? Board: certifications falsely stated reconciliations and proper trust handling. Kersenbrock: reconciliations performed in daily practice; no official record. Misrepresentation proven; false certification found.

Key Cases Cited

  • Iowa Supreme Ct. Att’y Disciplinary Bd. v. Netti, 797 N.W.2d 591 (Iowa 2011) (trust accounting and recordkeeping standards; proof by convincing preponderance)
  • Iowa Supreme Ct. Att’y Disciplinary Bd. v. Casey, 761 N.W.2d 53 (Iowa 2009) (premature collection of probate fees; improper fee practices)
  • Iowa Supreme Ct. Bd. of Prof’l Ethics & Conduct v. Gottschalk, 553 N.W.2d 322 (Iowa 1996) (impossibility of reconciling trust accounts supports noncompliance finding)
  • Iowa Supreme Ct. Att’y Disciplinary Bd. v. Wengert, 790 N.W.2d 94 (Iowa 2010) (false certification of trust accounting constitutes misrepresentation)
  • Iowa Supreme Ct. Att’y Disciplinary Bd. v. Adams, 623 N.W.2d 815 (Iowa 2001) (aggregate considerations of sanctions and aggravating/mitigating factors)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Sara Anne Kersenbrock
Court Name: Supreme Court of Iowa
Date Published: Sep 21, 2012
Citations: 821 N.W.2d 415; 12–0339
Docket Number: 12–0339
Court Abbreviation: Iowa
Log In
    Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Sara Anne Kersenbrock, 821 N.W.2d 415