midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
578 B.R. 866
Bankr. N.D. Ga.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff filed an Objection to Discharge (complaint) alleging Debtor concealed assets, made false oaths, and should be denied a Chapter 7 discharge and/or have the debt excepted from discharge arising from a business loan to the Debtor/Her LLC.
  • Debtor moved to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Bankr. R. 7012), arguing the complaint lacks sufficient particularity; Plaintiff did not respond.
  • Core factual allegations: Debtor was guarantor and sole owner/member of Hair She Is Salon, LLC; Plaintiff lent $46,971.76 and alleges $37,596.75 was for equipment; Debtor made four payments, then stopped and allegedly misrepresented the LLC’s status and failed to disclose assets beyond a $1,500 schedule entry.
  • Plaintiff asserted claims to deny discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)–(5) (concealment, inadequate records, false oaths, unexplained loss) and to except the debt from discharge under §§ 523(a)(2), (4), and (6) (fraud, fiduciary defalcation/embezzlement, willful/malicious injury).
  • Court evaluated pleading sufficiency under Twombly/Iqbal standards and Rule 9(b) for fraud, finding the complaint contains largely conclusory allegations lacking required particularity and factual support.
  • Court GRANTED the motion to dismiss but gave Plaintiff 21 days to file an amended complaint addressing deficiencies; failure to amend results in dismissal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether § 727(a)(2) (transfer/concealment with intent within 1 year) is sufficiently pled Debtor concealed LLC existence/assets and reinstated LLC prior to filing to hinder creditors LLC dissolution predated the one-year window; no specific facts alleging intent to hinder, delay, or defraud Dismissed for failure to plead required elements (timing and intent)
Whether § 727(a)(3)/(4)/(5) (inadequate records, false oaths, unexplained loss) are sufficiently alleged Debtor failed to disclose ownership, account for loan proceeds, and refused to provide records, constituting false oaths/inadequate records/unexplained loss Allegations are conclusory; Plaintiff fails to identify specific missing records, misstatements, requests, or prepetition records to show discrepancies Dismissed for lack of specific factual allegations; Plaintiff may amend
Whether § 523(a)(2)(A) (fraudulent obtaining of loan) is sufficiently alleged Debtor knowingly obtained loan without intent to repay; stopped payments and lied about LLC dissolution Complaint lacks specified misrepresentations, time/place/content, facts showing intent to deceive at loan origination, or justifiable reliance Dismissed for failure to plead fraud with particularity under Rule 9(b) and Twombly/Iqbal; leave to amend granted
Whether § 523(a)(4) and § 523(a)(6) claims are sufficiently alleged §523(a)(4): Debtor as guarantor/owner had fiduciary duties and committed defalcation by failing to account; §523(a)(6): Debtor willfully and maliciously injured Plaintiff by misusing/withholding funds No allegation of an express/technical trust preexisting the debt; no facts showing defalcation (bad faith or conscious disregard); §523(a)(6) requires intent to cause injury or substantial certainty of injury—complaint shows breach/nonpayment, not willful malicious tort Dismissed for failure to plead elements of fiduciary defalcation and willful/malicious injury; Plaintiff may replead with specificity

Key Cases Cited

  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (plausibility standard for pleading)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (application of plausibility standard to factual allegations)
  • American Dental Ass'n v. Cigna Corp., 605 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. pleading standard discussion)
  • Jennings v. Maxfield, 533 F.3d 1333 (11th Cir.) (elements and proof of § 727(a)(2))
  • Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279 (standard of proof for nondischargeability under § 523)
  • Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A., 569 U.S. 267 (defalcation standard under § 523(a)(4))
  • Kawaauhau v. Geiger, 523 U.S. 57 (narrowing § 523(a)(6) to intentional tort/willful and malicious injury)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Invest Atlanta Regional Center, LLC v. Smith (In re Smith)
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia
Date Published: Dec 1, 2017
Citations: 578 B.R. 866; CASE NO. 17-57882-PMB; ADVERSARY PROCEEDING NO. 17-5206
Docket Number: CASE NO. 17-57882-PMB; ADVERSARY PROCEEDING NO. 17-5206
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. N.D. Ga.
Log In