History
  • No items yet
midpage
2012 Ohio 2684
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • IntraSee is an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business in Westlake and an additional office in the Chicago area.
  • Ludwig, a Minnesota resident, entered into an at-will employment contract with IntraSee in August 2006 containing a forum-selection clause and choice-of-law provision (Ohio law, Lorain County).
  • Ludwig’s duties required travel to customer locations nationwide; she resigned in July 2010.
  • In October 2010, IntraSee sued Ludwig in Lorain County, alleging, among other things, breach of contract; the trial court dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction, finding the forum-selection clause unenforceable.
  • IntraSee appealed, and the court consolidated appeals; the appellate court sustained IntraSee’s first assignment of error, reversed, and remanded for further proceedings.
  • Dissenting opinion argues the forum-selection clause was invalid and relief from judgment should be denied.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the forum-selection clause governs personal jurisdiction IntraSee argues clause is valid and enforceable, establishing jurisdiction in Ohio. Ludwig contends clause is unenforceable due to unequal bargaining power and other factors. Forum-selection clause is valid and enforceable; trial court erred in dismissing.
Whether the trial court properly denied relief from judgment IntraSee seeks relief under Civ.R. 60(B)(2) based on new information. Ludwig contends relief should be denied. moot in light of reversal on the jurisdiction issue.
Whether the supplement to relief from judgment was properly denied IntraSee sought supplement to Civ.R. 60(B) motion. Ludwig opposes supplementation. moot in light of reversal on the jurisdiction issue.

Key Cases Cited

  • Preferred Capital Inc. v. Power Eng. Group, Inc., 112 Ohio St.3d 429 (2007-Ohio-257) (three-part test for forum-selection clause enforceability)
  • Kennecorp Mortgage Brokers, Inc. v. Country Club Convalescent Hosp., Inc., 66 Ohio St.3d 173 (1993) (fraud/overreaching and enforceability of forum clauses)
  • Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972) (universal test for forum-selection clauses)
  • Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 (1985) (waivability of due process through contractually chosen forum)
  • Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585 (1991) (nonnegotiated forum-selection clause may be enforceable)
  • Renacci v. Evans, 2009-Ohio-5154 (9th Dist.) (Ohio appellate interpretation of forum-clause enforceability)
  • Fallang v. Hickey, 40 Ohio St.3d 106 (1988) (Ohio long-arm/statutory analysis framework)
  • El UK Holdings, Inc. v. Cinergy UK, Inc., 2005-Ohio-1271 (9th Dist.) (de novo review of jurisdictional questions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: IntraSee v. Ludwig
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 18, 2012
Citations: 2012 Ohio 2684; 10CA009916, 11CA010024
Docket Number: 10CA009916, 11CA010024
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    IntraSee v. Ludwig, 2012 Ohio 2684