International Alliance of Theater Stage Employees Local 927 v. Lindsey
1:23-cv-04929
N.D. Ga.Jul 31, 2024Background
- The International Alliance of Theater Stage Employees Local 927 (the union) sued to enjoin enforcement of a Georgia law (S.B. 202) limiting the period for submitting absentee ballot applications to between 78 and 11 days before an election.
- Plaintiff is a Georgia-based labor union whose members frequently travel for work and thus often rely on absentee voting.
- The union alleges that the Georgia law's deadline (11 days before the election) violates Section 10502(d) of the Voting Rights Act, which permits absentee ballot applications up to 7 days prior.
- The union sought a preliminary injunction to enjoin the contested provision before the upcoming presidential election.
- The court considered standing (specifically associational standing’s “germaneness” prong) and whether relief was appropriate close to the election under the Purcell principle.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Associational standing – germaneness | Union’s mission includes supporting participation in democracy and elected officials who support labor; this makes voting rights germane. | Union’s core focus is labor rights, not voting rights or enforcement thereof. | Court found insufficient connection; voting rights not germane to union’s core mission. |
| Likelihood of success on merits | Union has members who will be harmed by the Georgia deadline, violating the VRA. | Union’s lack of standing defeats merits; no direct voting rights mission. | Union failed to show substantial likelihood of success due to lack of standing. |
| Preliminary injunction close to an election (Purcell) | Relief is urgent due to impending election; irreparable harm to members if law is enforced. | Courts should not alter election laws close to elections (Purcell principle). | Purcell bars injunction this close to election; election changes now risk confusion. |
| Timeliness (Delay in bringing suit) | Suit was brought before election; harm from law is imminent. | Law enacted 2+ years ago; union delayed in seeking injunctive relief. | Plaintiff’s delay weighed against granting relief under Merrill/Purcell. |
Key Cases Cited
- Sofarelli v. Pinellas County, 931 F.2d 718 (Preliminary injunction standard in Eleventh Circuit)
- Siegel v. LePore, 234 F.3d 1163 (Preliminary injunctions are an extraordinary remedy; movant must clearly establish prerequisites)
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Env’t Servs., 528 U.S. 167 (Established modern associational standing test)
- Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U.S. 1 (Courts should avoid changing election procedures close to elections)
- League of Women Voters of Fla., Inc. v. Florida Sec’y of State, 32 F.4th 1363 (Clarifies and applies the Purcell principle in the Eleventh Circuit)
- Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (Constitutional requirements for standing)
