History
  • No items yet
midpage
2012 S.D. 88
S.D.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • S.W.C. is the biological father of four children enrolled in the Oglala Sioux Tribe; ICWA applies.
  • Stepdaughter2 alleged rape by Father; children placed in foster care under an Immediate Protective Plan.
  • DSS developed case plans for Father and the mothers; Father remained incarcerated, limiting rehabilitative options.
  • Dispositional hearing held November 14, 2011; the children were in foster or treatment placements; parental rights began to be considered for termination.
  • Court found DSS had made active efforts to reunify the family, but those efforts were unsuccessful; termination recommended as least restrictive.
  • Final order terminated Father’s parental rights to all children; Mother1’s rights were not terminated for the stepchildren; two stepchildren placed in a planned permanent living arrangement.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether DSS satisfied ICWA’s active efforts standard S.W.C. asserts DSS did not provide active efforts to reunify. S.D. argues DSS’s efforts were sufficient and encompassed actions toward the family. Active efforts satisfied; DSS’s services to all parents, including incarcerated Father, met ICWA standard.
Whether termination of parental rights was the least restrictive alternative Father contends guardianship or another less restrictive option was possible given incarceration duration. State argues permanency and risk to children justify termination as least restrictive. Termination upheld as least restrictive alternative in the children’s best interests.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re L.S., 2012 S.D. 22 (2012) (best interests and least restrictive standard in termination cases)
  • People ex rel. J.I.H., 768 N.W.2d 168 (S.D. 2009) (clear error standard for factual findings; ICWA standards apply)
  • P.S.E., 816 N.W.2d 110 (S.D. 2012) (active vs. reasonable efforts under ICWA; deference to ICWA requirements)
  • Dashiell R. v. State, Dep’t of Health & Soc. Servs., 222 P.3d 841 (Alaska 2009) (consideration of non-incarcerated parent's services in keeping family together)
  • Miss. Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989) (ICWA aims to prevent unjustified removal of Indian children)
  • In re A.S., 2000 S.D. 94 (S.D. 2000) (guardianship vs. termination considerations in best interests)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Interests of S.H.E., D.H.E., J.W.C., D.W.C., J.R. & M.W.C.
Court Name: South Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 12, 2012
Citations: 2012 S.D. 88; 26299
Docket Number: 26299
Court Abbreviation: S.D.
Log In
    Interests of S.H.E., D.H.E., J.W.C., D.W.C., J.R. & M.W.C., 2012 S.D. 88