History
  • No items yet
midpage
Interest of C.N.
2013 ND 205
| N.D. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • C.G. appeals termination of parental rights and order to pay child support for his son C.N.
  • C.N. (born 2009) lives with his mother and siblings in Grafton; C.G. is his biological father.
  • C.G. was convicted of continuous sexual abuse of a child and is incarcerated for life with extended supervision; he will be incarcerated beyond C.N.’s adulthood.
  • C.G.’s communications with C.N.’s mother during incarceration prompted the State to seek termination of parental rights.
  • The juvenile court found C.N. deprived and aggravated circumstances, terminated C.G.’s rights, and required ongoing child support under conflicting statutes.
  • The Supreme Court affirmed, upholding both termination of parental rights and continued child support.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether C.N. is a deprived child supporting termination Whelan asserts deprivation due to C.G.’s incarceration and the sibling abuse dynamic. C.G. contends lack of ongoing harm or ability to parent negates deprivation. C.N. found deprived; deprivation supported by evidence.
Whether aggravated circumstances justify termination Whelan argues aggravated conduct and lengthy incarceration satisfy statutory aggravators. C.G. argues no direct harm to C.N. shown and no need to terminate. Aggravated circumstances supported by evidence.
Whether continued child support post-termination is proper Whelan contends statutory exception allows support obligations to continue after termination. C.G. argues termination extinguishes parental duties including support. Continued child support properly required.

Key Cases Cited

  • Interest of D.D., 2006 ND 30 (ND) (clear and convincing standard for termination)
  • In re M.G., 2010 ND 157 (ND) (clear and convincing evidence standard; termination framework)
  • In re D.M., 2007 ND 62 (ND) (definitional limits on clearly erroneous findings)
  • In re C.R., 1999 ND 221 (ND) (incarceration does not negate deprivation if proper parental care cannot be provided)
  • Interest of K.L. and M.S., 2008 ND 131 (ND) (present capability to be an adequate parent required)
  • State v. Gomez, 2011 ND 29 (ND) (affirmed conviction on multiple grounds)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Interest of C.N.
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 21, 2013
Citation: 2013 ND 205
Docket Number: 20130231
Court Abbreviation: N.D.