920 N.W.2d 461
N.D.2018Background
- Child A.L.E., born Sept. 2015, removed from mother A.E.’s care and in foster/social services custody for 707 days due to mother's substance abuse and related incarcerations.
- A.E. used marijuana during pregnancy; A.L.E. tested positive for marijuana at birth; methamphetamine, marijuana, and paraphernalia were later found in A.E.’s home.
- A.E. has a history of relapses, multiple incarcerations (including a six-month period when she could not parent), missed/poor-quality visits, and failure to follow social services’ recommendations.
- A.L.E. has physical and mental abnormalities that the court found were not being helped by A.E.’s conduct.
- Juvenile court terminated A.E.’s parental rights; A.E. appealed challenging (1) the deprived finding, (2) the finding that causes of deprivation are likely to continue, and (3) that reasonable reunification efforts were made (and argued a relative placement exception applied).
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (A.E.) | Defendant's Argument (Social Services) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether A.L.E. is a "deprived" child | Mother: court erred—challenge to deprivation finding | State: prenatal drug exposure and presence of drugs/paraphernalia show deprivation | Affirmed: deprivation established by clear and convincing evidence |
| Whether causes of deprivation are likely to continue | Mother: causes won’t likely continue | State: history of relapse, incarcerations, missed visits, noncompliance predict continuation | Affirmed: likelihood to continue proven |
| Whether Social Services made reasonable reunification efforts | Mother: agency failed to make reasonable efforts under statute | State: numerous services and referrals were provided | Affirmed: reasonable efforts were made |
| Whether kinship placement required dismissal of petition | Mother: child placed with maternal aunt; statute allows exception | State: statute’s list is permissive, not mandatory—dismissal not required | Affirmed: exception not mandatory; petition properly proceeded |
Key Cases Cited
- Matter of C.D.G.E., 889 N.W.2d 863 (N.D. 2017) (standard that elements must be proved by clear and convincing evidence)
- Interest of A.B., 898 N.W.2d 676 (N.D. 2017) (review standard and that past conduct/cooperation informs future risk)
- Interest of K.B., 801 N.W.2d 416 (N.D. 2011) (lack of cooperation with social services evidences likelihood deprivation will continue)
- Interest of D.H., 783 N.W.2d 12 (N.D. 2010) (incarceration relevant to assessing future ability to parent)
- Interest of E.R., 688 N.W.2d 384 (N.D. 2004) (a parent who voluntarily becomes unavailable should not delay child's permanency)
- Interest of M.R., 870 N.W.2d 175 (N.D. 2015) (reinforcing precedent protecting child’s need for stability)
