History
  • No items yet
midpage
920 N.W.2d 461
N.D.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Child A.L.E., born Sept. 2015, removed from mother A.E.’s care and in foster/social services custody for 707 days due to mother's substance abuse and related incarcerations.
  • A.E. used marijuana during pregnancy; A.L.E. tested positive for marijuana at birth; methamphetamine, marijuana, and paraphernalia were later found in A.E.’s home.
  • A.E. has a history of relapses, multiple incarcerations (including a six-month period when she could not parent), missed/poor-quality visits, and failure to follow social services’ recommendations.
  • A.L.E. has physical and mental abnormalities that the court found were not being helped by A.E.’s conduct.
  • Juvenile court terminated A.E.’s parental rights; A.E. appealed challenging (1) the deprived finding, (2) the finding that causes of deprivation are likely to continue, and (3) that reasonable reunification efforts were made (and argued a relative placement exception applied).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (A.E.) Defendant's Argument (Social Services) Held
Whether A.L.E. is a "deprived" child Mother: court erred—challenge to deprivation finding State: prenatal drug exposure and presence of drugs/paraphernalia show deprivation Affirmed: deprivation established by clear and convincing evidence
Whether causes of deprivation are likely to continue Mother: causes won’t likely continue State: history of relapse, incarcerations, missed visits, noncompliance predict continuation Affirmed: likelihood to continue proven
Whether Social Services made reasonable reunification efforts Mother: agency failed to make reasonable efforts under statute State: numerous services and referrals were provided Affirmed: reasonable efforts were made
Whether kinship placement required dismissal of petition Mother: child placed with maternal aunt; statute allows exception State: statute’s list is permissive, not mandatory—dismissal not required Affirmed: exception not mandatory; petition properly proceeded

Key Cases Cited

  • Matter of C.D.G.E., 889 N.W.2d 863 (N.D. 2017) (standard that elements must be proved by clear and convincing evidence)
  • Interest of A.B., 898 N.W.2d 676 (N.D. 2017) (review standard and that past conduct/cooperation informs future risk)
  • Interest of K.B., 801 N.W.2d 416 (N.D. 2011) (lack of cooperation with social services evidences likelihood deprivation will continue)
  • Interest of D.H., 783 N.W.2d 12 (N.D. 2010) (incarceration relevant to assessing future ability to parent)
  • Interest of E.R., 688 N.W.2d 384 (N.D. 2004) (a parent who voluntarily becomes unavailable should not delay child's permanency)
  • Interest of M.R., 870 N.W.2d 175 (N.D. 2015) (reinforcing precedent protecting child’s need for stability)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Interest of A.L.E.
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 6, 2018
Citations: 920 N.W.2d 461; 2018 ND 257; 20180341
Docket Number: 20180341
Court Abbreviation: N.D.
Log In
    Interest of A.L.E., 920 N.W.2d 461