History
  • No items yet
midpage
75 So. 3d 893
La.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Wright suffered a 1973 injury, resulting in ~1.7 million in damages and a court-appointed euratrix, Mrs. Wright.
  • The 1982 interdiction order allowed investment in long-term bonds with funds channeled through a Custodian Account.
  • Mrs. Wright arranged investment via A.G. Edwards through Edwin Reardon; both received a copy of the court order.
  • In 2002, Mrs. Wright sued Reardon and A.G. Edwards for fiduciary and securities-law violations, alleging misappropriation and mismanagement.
  • A NASD arbitration stayed by court order resulted in a 2006 award of 150,000 to the succession against A.G. Edwards.
  • In 2008-2010, Asher (successor) sought contempt; the First Circuit held the unconfirmed NASD award precluded Asher’s claims on res judicata grounds.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Can an unconfirmed arbitration award have res judicata effect? Asher argues unconfirmed award lacks judicial judgment and thus cannot preclude. Edwards contends unconfirmed award is res judicata because parties agreed to arbitrate and same conduct. Unconfirmed arbitration award does not have res judicata effect.
When does res judicata attach under La. RS 13:4231? Judgments must be valid and final to have preclusive effect; unconfirmed award is not a judgment. Award, once accepted or final, should preclude subsequent actions. Res judicata requires a valid and final judgment; unconfirmed awards are not judgments.
Are arbitration awards subject to confirmation to become judgments enforceable? Confirmation not mandatory for preclusion; effect exists despite lack of confirmation. Legislature intended confirmation to confer enforceable judgment; unconfirmed awards lack finality. Judgment may be entered in conformity with confirmed awards; unconfirmed awards lack judgment status.

Key Cases Cited

  • FIA Card Services, NA v. Weaver, 62 So.3d 709 (La. 2011) (arbitration must be confirmed to be enforceable; not ministerial)
  • Wooley v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Ins. Co., 893 So.2d 746 (La. 2005) (administrative decisions not final judgments for res judicata)
  • State v. O'Reilly, 785 So.2d 768 (La. 2001) (constitutional limits on delegation of judicial power; arbitral awards require judicial review)
  • McCarty v. Zacharie, 11 La. Ann. 474 (La. 1856) (early view that unconfirmed awards lack finality)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Interdiction of Wright
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Oct 25, 2011
Citations: 75 So. 3d 893; 2011 WL 5832333; 2011 La. LEXIS 2590; No. 2010-CC-1826
Docket Number: No. 2010-CC-1826
Court Abbreviation: La.
Log In
    Interdiction of Wright, 75 So. 3d 893