midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
52 So. 3d 313
La. Ct. App.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • IHS alleges 108 fraudulent checks drawn on Chase were cashed at Abe's Grocery and then deposited to Jeff Davis Bank for collection and paid from Chase.
  • Jeff Davis Bank moved to dismiss claiming no cause of action against a depositary/collecting bank under Louisiana law.
  • UCC displacement applies to negligent acceptance/payment/presentment of forged checks and displaces traditional negligence claims against banks.
  • Plaintiff argues Jeff Davis Bank owes a presentment warranty under La.R.S. 10:3-417 and seeks related relief.
  • Court held the petition fails to state a presentment warranty claim and that the negligence-based relief is displaced by the UCC; dismissal affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is there a presentment warranty claim under La.R.S. 10:3-417 against Jeff Davis Bank? IHS seeks warranty relief for presented checks. Bank disputes applicability; no presentment against a drawee/drawer under the cited sections. No; petition lacks necessary allegations (drawee dishonor or presentation to drawer) for presentment warranty.
Does the UCC displacement bar IHS's negligence-based claims against Jeff Davis Bank? Negligence-based claims survive notwithstanding older law. UCC displacement displaces negligent acceptance/presentment claims against a depositary/collecting bank. Yes; negligence claims are displaced by the UCC; no actionable claim against Jeff Davis Bank.

Key Cases Cited

  • Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Com'n, 646 So.2d 885 (La. 1994) (peremptory exception of no cause of action tests whether law provides a remedy)
  • Barrie v. V.P. Exterminators, Inc., 625 So.2d 1007 (La. 1993) (de novo review of a ruling on no cause of action)
  • Finova Capital Corp. v. IT Corp., 774 So.2d 1129 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2000) (displacement principles under UCC)
  • Colonial Bank v. Marina Seafood Market, Inc., 425 So.2d 722 (La. 1983) (bank liable for forged instrument against customer)
  • Marx v. Whitney Nat. Bank, 713 So.2d 1142 (La. 1998) (fraudulent alteration remedies and payor bank responsibilities)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Innovative Hospitality Systems, L.L.C. v. Abe's Inc.
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Dec 8, 2010
Citations: 52 So. 3d 313; 2010 WL 4961809; 2010 La. App. LEXIS 1659; 10 La.App. 3 Cir. 509; 73 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 251; 10-509
Docket Number: 10-509
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In
    Innovative Hospitality Systems, L.L.C. v. Abe's Inc., 52 So. 3d 313