History
  • No items yet
midpage
988 N.E.2d 1274
Ind. T.C.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • IndyGo sought an excess property tax levy for 2007 due to alleged revenue shortfalls caused by erroneous assessed valuations.
  • DLGF referred the request to the Local Government Tax Control Board; board recommended approval of excess levy for 2006 and 2007.
  • DLGF denied IndyGo's 2007 excess levy request after review, stating IndyGo had no 2007 shortfall; certified levy exceeded actual collections.
  • DLGF separately approved a 2006 excess levy (modifying the amount due to an over-collection in 2008).
  • IndyGo appealed to the court challenging the 2007 denial, arguing improper procedure and lack of substantial evidence; IndyGo argued methodology counted wrong collections.
  • The court reviewed the administrative record for whether DLGF’s factual findings were supported by substantial evidence and whether its conclusions complied with the law.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether DLGF followed the statute in denying the 2007 excess levy IndyGo contends DLGF violated IC 6-1.1-18.5-16 and used improper calculations. IndyGo bears burden; DLGF’s decision reflects law and substantial evidence; methodology dispute improperly reweighs evidence. Affirmed; DLGF did not err in denying 2007 excess levy.
Whether the 2007 denial is supported by substantial evidence when IndyGo’s 2006 approval used similar data DLGF’s 2007 denial lacks rational explanation given similar data/methodology used for 2006. Court should not reweigh evidence; 2006 methodology does not compel 2007 result; administrative record supports denial. Affirmed; evidence supports denial of 2007 request.

Key Cases Cited

  • Amax Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 552 N.E.2d 850 (Ind. Tax Ct.1990) (substantial evidence standard for administrative decisions)
  • Scopelite v. Dep’t of Local Gov’t Fin., 939 N.E.2d 1138 (Ind. Tax Ct.2010) (scope of judicial review for DLGF decisions)
  • DeKalb Cnty. E. Cmty. Sch., Dist. v. Dep’t of Local Gov’t Fin., 930 N.E.2d 1257 (Ind. Tax Ct.2010) (consideration of evidence in DLGF appeals)
  • Clark-Pleasant Cmty. Sch. Corp. v. Dep’t of Local Gov’t Fin., 899 N.E.2d 762 (Ind. Tax Ct.2008) (reliance on administrative record for factual findings)
  • Shelbyville MHPI, LLC v. Thurston, 978 N.E.2d 527 (Ind. Tax Ct.2013) (standard for reviewing administrative agency determinations)
  • Grant Cnty. Assessor v. Kerasotes Showplace Theatres, LLC, 955 N.E.2d 876 (Ind. Tax Ct.2011) (evidence sufficiency in tax appeal context)
  • Gatling Gun Club, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 420 N.E.2d 1324 (Ind.Ct.App.1981) (limits of judicial review of agency decisions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Indianapolis Public Transportation Corp. v. Indiana Department of Local Government Finance
Court Name: Indiana Tax Court
Date Published: May 3, 2013
Citations: 988 N.E.2d 1274; 2013 WL 1856833; 2013 Ind. Tax LEXIS 9; No. 49T10-0910-TA-76
Docket Number: No. 49T10-0910-TA-76
Court Abbreviation: Ind. T.C.
Log In