Indiana Area Foundation of the United Methodist Church, Inc. v. Snyder
2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1643
Ind. Ct. App.2011Background
- Snyder was appointed pastor of Bloomfield United Methodist Church in 2004; the Board of the Ordained Ministry and church leaders included Reverend Ostermeier and Bishop Coyner.
- In 2006, Snyder met with Julie Martin after a complaint; Snyder alleges he was drugged and later memory loss occurred.
- The Board placed Snyder on study/renewal leave in 2006; a formal intra-church complaint followed in 2006 and a ninety-day suspension with mandatory psychological evaluation.
- In 2007 Snyder chose involuntary leave; he was required to undergo medical and psychiatric evaluation and treatment.
- From 2008 to 2009 the church disclosed Snyder’s status to parishioners and the Bloomfield Church responded to inquiries.
- Snyder filed suit in 2008 alleging breach of contract and defamation; the trial court later granted partial summary judgment and certified for interlocutory appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Appellants were entitled to summary judgment on defamation. | Snyder argues statements about his fitness to minister were defamatory. | Appellants claim church autonomy shields them from civil review of ecclesiastical statements. | Defamation claim must be evaluated under First Amendment church autonomy; there are facts supporting entitlement to summary judgment for Appellants. |
| Whether there was an enforceable contract to breach for Snyder under The Book of Discipline. | Snyder contends The Book of Discipline created an enforceable contract with alleged breaches. | Resolution requires interpretation of religious doctrine; court should not adjudicate under First Amendment. | No enforceable civil contract without excessive entanglement; summary judgment on breach of contract affirmed. |
Key Cases Cited
- Brazauskas v. Fort Wayne-South Bend Diocese, Inc., 796 N.E.2d 286 (Ind. 2003) (church autonomy/defamation context; First Amendment limitations on review of ecclesiastical decisions)
- Brazauskas v. Fort Wayne-South Bend Diocese, Inc., 714 N.E.2d 253 (Ind.Ct.App. 1999) (initial decision on defamation and church governance; entanglement concerns)
- McEnroy v. St. Meinrad School of Theology, 713 N.E.2d 334 (Ind.Ct.App. 1999) (neutral principles; First Amendment limits on court interference in religious doctrine)
- Bryce v. Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Colorado, 289 F.3d 648 (10th Cir. 2002) (organization autonomy and employment decisions in religious institutions)
- Rayburn v. General Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists, 772 F.2d 1164 (4th Cir. 1985) (ministerial exception and church governance)
