History
  • No items yet
midpage
Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Guidant Mutual Insurance Co.
99 So. 3d 142
| Miss. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • This is the second appeal after Guidant I; INA seeks defense-cost reimbursement and contribution from Guidant.
  • Hingle's accident (1994) involved Guidant auto and umbrella policies and INA (primary vs excess) through Marshall County.
  • Andersons sued Hingle, Marshall County, the fire department, and the Board of Supervisors in 1995 for about $4.15M.
  • Guidant argued it was primary and could contribute from its umbrella after Guidant auto and INA policies exhausted.
  • On remand (2007 judgment; 2011 final judgment), Guidant owed $500,000 ( Guidant auto) before INA contributes up to $300,000; total settlement was $750,000.
  • Rule 56(f) continuance was denied; summary judgment on contribution was upheld; prejudgment interest was denied.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Rule 56(f) continuance was abused INA needed discovery Guidant lacked new material facts No abuse; denial upheld
Whether Guidant is entitled to contribution from INA Guidant must show legal liability to settle; damages matter INA liable for contribution within policy limits Guidant entitled to contribution up to INA’s limits after Guidant exhausts its own
Whether prejudgment interest should be awarded Defense costs liquidated and prejudgment interest warranted No bad-faith or liquidated prior amount; discretion applied No prejudgment interest awarded

Key Cases Cited

  • Travelers Indem. Co. v. Chappell, 246 So.2d 498 (Miss. 1971) (primary-excess exhaustion principle)
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 255 So.2d 667 (Miss. 1971) (insurer duties; settlement authority for insureds)
  • Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Foster, 528 So.2d 255 (Miss. 1988) (insurer must evaluate claims in insured’s best interests)
  • Upchurch Plumbing, Inc. v. Greenwood Utilities Commission, 964 So.2d 1100 (Miss. 2007) (criteria for prejudgment interest; liquidated vs bad-faith denial)
  • Guidant Mut. Ins. Co. v. Indem. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 13 So.3d 1270 (Miss. 2009) ( Guidant I; control of defense/settlement; contribution framework)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Guidant Mutual Insurance Co.
Court Name: Mississippi Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 4, 2012
Citation: 99 So. 3d 142
Docket Number: No. 2011-CA-00168-SCT
Court Abbreviation: Miss.