midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
2025 TC Memo 55
T.C.
2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Hani and Inaam Ataya were shareholders in Cost U Less Cars, Inc., a used-car business in California.
  • For tax years 2015 and 2016, both petitioners failed to report dividend income received from the corporation and claimed certain unjustified Schedule C business deductions on their individual tax returns.
  • The IRS conducted a bank-deposits analysis that revealed unreported income and disallowed deductions, leading to deficiency notices and proposed accuracy-related penalties under IRC § 6662 for negligence.
  • After both sides conceded most factual issues, the only dispute at trial was whether the Atayas were liable for accuracy-related penalties due to negligence or disregard of rules.
  • The Atayas argued they relied on tax professionals and lost business records, and that circumstances surrounding the corporation's suspension by California unfairly hampered their defense, but the Tax Court found these defenses unconvincing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Liability for accuracy-related penalties under § 6662 Atayas: Reliance on professionals, lack of access to records, unfairness IRS: Negligence in recordkeeping and reporting; no reasonable cause Penalties upheld
Reasonable cause/good faith exception Atayas: Reasonable reliance on bookkeepers/tax preparer, records lost IRS: No evidence of qualified, competent advice or good faith Exception not met
Procedural compliance with penalty approval (§ 6751) (Not disputed after evidence presented) IRS: Timely managerial penalty approval obtained IRS complied
Effect of lost records/corporate suspension Atayas: Loss of records prevents adequate defense, due to state action IRS: No evidence records seized by state or impeded court Argument rejected

Key Cases Cited

  • Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111 (1933) (Commissioner's deficiency determinations presumed correct)
  • Walquist v. Commissioner, 152 T.C. 61 (2019) (burden shifts to taxpayer once IRS links income to taxpayer)
  • Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438 (2001) (IRS’s burden of production for penalties; good faith/reasonable cause exception)
  • Neonatology Assocs., P.A. v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 43 (2000) (three-part test for reasonable reliance on professional advice)
  • Laidlaw’s Harley Davidson Sales, Inc. v. Commissioner, 29 F.4th 1066 (9th Cir. 2022) (timing and discretion for penalty approval required by supervisor)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Inaam Ataya
Court Name: United States Tax Court
Date Published: Jun 4, 2025
Citations: 2025 TC Memo 55; 24029-22
Docket Number: 24029-22
Court Abbreviation: T.C.
Log In