History
  • No items yet
midpage
In the Matter of V.H. J.H. v. Indiana Dept. of Child Services
2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 237
| Ind. Ct. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Mother is a single parent with two daughters; V.H. (16) and I.H. (17) with V.H. having behavioral issues and an IEP under IDEA; DCS investigated after two incidents where V.H. physically assaulted Mother, who outweighed by ~30 pounds; DCS petitioned CHINS alleging neglect; CHINS factfinding found V.H. was CHINS and ordered services; Mother argued no abuse/neglect and services unrelated to CHINS; appeal challenges CHINS adjudication and the participation decree; appellate court reversed adjudication and vacated participation decree.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether V.H. was a CHINS under I.C. 31-34-1-1. Mother argues no neglect/need for coercive intervention. DCS asserts V.H.’s condition requires court-ordered care. CHINS adjudication reversed; no coercive intervention needed.
Whether the participation decree orders were improper boilerplate and unrelated to CHINS. Participation terms were unrelated to CHINS and boilerplate. DCS recommended standard services. Participation decree vacated; boilerplate and unrelated terms rejected.
Whether the transcript from the factfinding hearing affected dispositional rulings. Transcript could influence dispositional recommendations. Transcript not necessary for standard services. Procedural error merited vacating participation order; transcript relevant.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re T.H., 856 N.E.2d 1247 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006) (due process protections in CHINS cases while allowing state intervention)
  • In re N.E., 919 N.E.2d 102 (Ind. 2010) (CHINS standard: need for care and coercive intervention when necessary)
  • In re A.H., 913 N.E.2d 303 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009) (intervention justified without tragedy; timing of court involvement)
  • Parmeter v. Cass Cnty. Dep’t of Child Servs., 878 N.E.2d 444 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) (two-tier review; deference to facts but not to law)
  • A.C. v. Marion County Dep’t of Child Servs., 905 N.E.2d 456 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009) (boilerplate requirements cannot be unsupported by evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In the Matter of V.H. J.H. v. Indiana Dept. of Child Services
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 22, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 237
Docket Number: 49A02-1110-JC-947
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.