History
  • No items yet
midpage
In the Matter of the Athlete Agent Application of Donald Walthal.l
A16-0626
| Minn. Ct. App. | Feb 13, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Donald Walthall, former mortgage-originator and CEO of Universal Mortgage, was convicted of multiple felonies for mortgage fraud and racketeering, sentenced to prison, and later had his real-estate-closing license and notary commission revoked; a $330,000 civil fine remained unpaid.
  • After completing his sentence, Walthall applied to register as an athlete agent under Minn. Stat. ch. 81A; the Department of Commerce notified him it intended to deny the application and he requested a contested-case hearing.
  • An ALJ recommended granting registration, but the Commissioner of Commerce independently denied the application, citing statutory factors bearing on fitness to act as an athlete agent.
  • The Commissioner found Walthall’s criminal convictions, the nature and context of his mortgage-fraud conduct (including exploiting unsophisticated consumers and using co-conspirators), and his outstanding civil penalty weighed against registration.
  • The Minnesota Court of Appeals reviewed under the administrative-review standard (deference to agency factfinding and reasoned decisionmaking) and affirmed the Commissioner’s denial despite noting an error in how discretionary factors were described.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Commissioner misapplied discretionary factors in Minn. Stat. § 81A.06, subd. 2(a) Walthall: some discretionary factors (2,5,6) weigh in his favor (truthful application; no prior agent licensure discipline; no sports sanctions) and Commissioner ignored them Commissioner: discretionary factors (1,3,7) (felony convictions, fiduciary misconduct, harm to credibility) justify denial; Commissioner stated none weighed for applicant Court: Commissioner misstated that no discretionary factors favored Walthall, but record shows factors (2,5,6) favor him; error was harmless and does not require reversal
Whether Commissioner improperly weighed recency of misconduct (mandatory factor (1)) Walthall: crimes occurred long ago (~8+ years) and lack of other criminal history favors registration Commissioner: long period included incarceration; recency and inability to show rehabilitation is neutral at best Court: Commissioner’s recency finding supported by record; court will not reweigh evidence; upheld Commissioner
Whether mortgage-fraud context is relevant to athlete-agent fitness (mandatory factor (2)) Walthall: real-estate fraud context is not analogous to athlete-agent work; conviction should not permanently bar registration Commissioner: fiduciary and financial abuse in mortgage practice is analogous to athlete-agent duties and undermines fitness Court: Commissioner reasonably concluded contexts are analogous and that nature/context of misconduct weighs heavily against registration
Whether Commissioner erred by considering failure to pay civil penalty (mandatory factor (3)) Walthall: considering unpaid civil fine improperly penalizes indigence and is not intended by statute Commissioner: unpaid civil penalty is relevant conduct and bears on public protection and deterrence Court: statute permits considering other relevant conduct; Commissioner’s reasoning reasonable; factor treated as neutral overall and upheld

Key Cases Cited

  • Fine v. Bernstein, 726 N.W.2d 137 (Minn. App. 2007) (presumption that agency decisions are correct)
  • Pomrenke v. Comm’r of Commerce, 677 N.W.2d 85 (Minn. App. 2004) (review defers to agency if reasoned decisionmaking shown)
  • Vargas v. Nw. Area Found., 673 N.W.2d 200 (Minn. App. 2004) (appellate courts may not reweigh conflicting evidence)
  • In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn., 624 N.W.2d 264 (Minn. 2001) (agency conclusions are not arbitrary if a rational connection between facts and choice is articulated)
  • In re Review of 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges, 768 N.W.2d 112 (Minn. 2009) (agency decision not arbitrary where room for two opinions exists)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In the Matter of the Athlete Agent Application of Donald Walthal.l
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Date Published: Feb 13, 2017
Docket Number: A16-0626
Court Abbreviation: Minn. Ct. App.