In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: D. C., Parent.
A16-996
| Minn. Ct. App. | Dec 5, 2016Background
- Mother (D.C.) is biological parent of D.M.C.; county petitioned to terminate her parental rights after multiple child-protection involvements and out-of-home placements.
- Prior CPS history (2008–2009, 2013–2014, 2015) included parenting services, convictions for malicious punishment of a child, and children placed with a relative; criminal and safety incidents included physical abuse findings and a DWI.
- In April 2015 children were removed after reports the mother choked and threatened a child; D.M.C. was placed with a relative and remained out of the mother’s care through termination proceedings.
- County provided a case plan (May 2015) requiring parenting education, mental-health and chemical-dependency assessments, anger management, and counseling; mother frequently failed to engage, moved between Minnesota and Nebraska, and did not keep the county informed of her whereabouts.
- Psychological and parenting evaluations (completed during trial) diagnosed PTSD, alcohol-use disorder, personality disorder features, and concluded prognosis was poor without long-term treatment; evaluators warned of risk to the child.
- District court found statutory grounds for termination, concluded the county made reasonable efforts to reunify, and terminated parental rights; Court of Appeals affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the county made reasonable efforts to reunify D.C. and D.M.C. | County failed to provide services promptly, did not follow through on referrals after evaluations, and thus did not make reasonable efforts. | County provided extensive, individualized services over multiple CPS involvements; mother’s repeated nonengagement, moves across states, and failure to keep contact impeded services; further services would be futile. | Court affirmed: county made reasonable efforts; district court’s finding not clearly erroneous. |
Key Cases Cited
- In re Welfare of Children of S.E.P., 744 N.W.2d 381 (Minn. 2008) (standard for appellate review and requirements for termination proceedings)
- In re Welfare of Children of T.R., 750 N.W.2d 656 (Minn. 2008) (county must provide services tailored to parental limitations)
- In re Welfare of Children of J.K.T., 814 N.W.2d 76 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012) (factors for assessing reasonable efforts include length, nature, and quality of effort)
- In re Welfare of Children of J.R.B., 805 N.W.2d 895 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011) (review standard for factual findings in termination cases)
- In re Welfare of L.A.F., 554 N.W.2d 393 (Minn. 1996) (district court’s superior position to assess witness credibility)
- In re Welfare of Children of S.W., 727 N.W.2d 144 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007) (reasonable efforts require real, genuine assistance beyond mere form)
