History
  • No items yet
midpage
in the Matter of L.G.G., a Juvenile
2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 10119
Tex. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Juvenile court adjudicated L.G.G. delinquent for capital murder in Feb 2007, sentenced to 40 years with possible transfer to TDCJ after majority.
  • In June 2011, the trial court ordered transfer of the remaining sentence to TDCJ; L.G.G. appeals two issues.
  • Offense occurred Sept 11, 2006; L.G.G. was 16; accomplice Sandoval testified to brutal, premeditated murder during robbery.
  • Disposition hearing Jan 30, 2007 included a stipulation confessing to the offense; judgment Feb 1, 2007 committed L.G.G. to TYС with possible transfer to TDCJ for 40 years.
  • Transfer hearing considered factors under Tex. Fam. Code §54.11; the court acknowledged rehabilitation but found risk of reoffending supported transfer; record includes both rehabilitative evidence and brutal offense history.
  • The court’s transfer order awarded TYC time credits from Jan 30, 2007 to June 8, 2011, but omitted pre-transfer detention time from Sept 12, 2006 to Jan 30, 2007; appellate modification granted to include all pre-sentence detention time.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did the trial court abuse its discretion by transferring to TDCJ despite rehabilitation evidence? G.G. argues rehabilitation in TYС undermined transfer. Court weighed offense severity and protection of public; rehabilitation evidence supported transfer. No abuse of discretion; substantial evidence supported transfer.
Did the transfer order properly credit pre-sentence time? Entitled to time credit from Sept 12, 2006. Credit limited to time in TYС per order. Modify order to grant pre-sentence credit from Sept 12, 2006 through June 8, 2011.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re F.D., 245 S.W.3d 110 (Tex. App. — Dallas 2008) (abuse-of-discretion standard for transfer decisions in juvenile cases)
  • Ex parte Green, 688 S.W.2d 555 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985) (pre-sentence time credit generally awarded; nunc pro tunc remedies available)
  • Ex parte Evans, 964 S.W.2d 643 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (time credit and correction standards in habeas context)
  • Ex parte Harvey, 846 S.W.2d 328 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993) (pre-sentence credit remedies and correction of records)
  • Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (habeas relief limitations; time-credit context)
  • Phillips v. State, 64 S.W.3d 458 (Tex. App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 2001) (judgment nunc pro tunc and time-credit considerations)
  • Rodriguez v. State, 2009 WL 1801264 (Tex. App. — Corpus Christi 2009) (appellate authority to correct clerical time-credit error on direct appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: in the Matter of L.G.G., a Juvenile
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Dec 6, 2012
Citation: 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 10119
Docket Number: 13-11-00408-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.