History
  • No items yet
midpage
In the Matter of: J.J.E., a minor through his parent and natural guardian Sherrie Williams, Relator v. Independent School District 279 (Osseo Area Public Schools), Office of Administrative Hearings
A16-828
| Minn. Ct. App. | Jan 17, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Student J.J.E., a high-school special-education student with academic and behavioral needs, previously received five hours/week of one-on-one instruction at home under a Columbia Heights IEP and passed his classes.
  • Family moved to Independent School District 279 (Osseo) before 2015–2016; district received prior IEP and proposed to continue one-on-one services temporarily then reassess.
  • Parent (Williams) refused district proposals because they did not guarantee at-home instruction and would interfere with football; she signed prior written notices (PWNs) later that reflected a shortened in-class schedule instead of at-home services.
  • Williams filed administrative hearing requests alleging the district failed to implement the IEP and sought at-home instruction and compensatory relief; the district proposed a full-day, in-school IEP and asked for a hearing to approve it.
  • An ALJ held a consolidated hearing, found the district followed IDEA procedures, concluded the IEP (as modified by PWNs) did not require at-home instruction, found the district’s full-day IEP would provide a FAPE in the least-restrictive environment, and denied Williams’s disqualification motion and relief.
  • The Court of Appeals affirmed the ALJ: procedural compliance and substantive adequacy were supported by substantial evidence; no demonstrated judicial bias.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether district violated IDEA procedures when changing/implementing IEP Williams: district failed to follow procedural safeguards and changed the IEP to eliminate at-home instruction without proper consent District: gave notice, held conciliation, and PWNs reflecting agreement; IEP as modified did not require home instruction Court: Affirmed ALJ — substantial evidence that district followed procedures and Williams agreed to PWNs
Whether district failed to implement IEP or provide FAPE by not providing at-home instruction Williams: absence of at-home one-on-one instruction denied FAPE and required compensatory services District: in-school, shortened/full-day programs and proposed full-day IEP provided educational benefit in least-restrictive environment Court: Affirmed ALJ — evidence of academic progress and social/behavioral improvement supports that IEP provided FAPE
Whether the district’s proposed full-day IEP was appropriate Williams: full-day placement would harm participation (e.g., football) and fail to meet needs District: full-day placement supported by staff testimony as better for behavior, socialization, and post-secondary prospects Court: Affirmed ALJ — proposed full-day IEP reasonably calculated to provide educational benefit
Whether the assigned ALJ should have been disqualified for bias Williams: ALJ was biased, yelled, mocked, deleted record content, and gave district unfair advantage District: ALJ conduct was appropriate; no substantial proof of prejudice Court: Affirmed ALJ — record does not show bias; Williams did not meet burden to show prejudice

Key Cases Cited

  • Rowley v. Board of Education, 458 U.S. 176 (explains two-step FAPE analysis and that IDEA does not guarantee maximizing potential)
  • Schaffer ex rel. Schaffer v. Weast, 546 U.S. 49 (burden of proof in administrative IDEA hearings lies with party seeking relief)
  • Blackmon v. Springfield R-XII Sch. Dist., 198 F.3d 648 (lists required IEP components)
  • Independent Sch. Dist. No. 283 v. S.D. by J.D., 88 F.3d 556 (IDEA’s preference for least-restrictive environment and presumption favoring in-school placement)
  • CJN v. Minneapolis Pub. Schs., 323 F.3d 630 (IEP must address particular academic and behavioral disabilities)
  • Bradley ex rel. Bradley v. Arkansas Dep’t of Educ., 443 F.3d 965 (IDEA does not require furnishing every special service necessary to maximize potential)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In the Matter of: J.J.E., a minor through his parent and natural guardian Sherrie Williams, Relator v. Independent School District 279 (Osseo Area Public Schools), Office of Administrative Hearings
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Date Published: Jan 17, 2017
Docket Number: A16-828
Court Abbreviation: Minn. Ct. App.