midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
360 S.W.3d 355
Mo. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Child was born 11/19/2008 to Mother and tested positive for amphetamines; DF S took custody of Child.
  • Father was identified as Child’s father and made a party to the proceedings; jurisdictional actions followed.
  • On 1/8/2009, circuit court assumed jurisdiction and ordered that Child remain in Division custody.
  • At the 10/29/2010 permanency hearing, Father sought custody or supervised visitation under §211.037.
  • The court granted several provisions: Division retains custody, Child moves to an alternate foster home, Mother undergoes drug screens and compliance, Father undergoes drug screens and compliance, and a permanency review was scheduled for 1/10/2011.
  • The court denied Father’s request for custody/visitation pending termination proceedings; Father appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is the October 29, 2010 order appealable Father argues under §211.037 for return to non-offending parent. Respondent contends orders under §210.720 are not appealable final judgments. Appeal dismissed; not a final appealable judgment.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re L.E.C., 94 S.W.3d 420 (Mo.App. W.D.2003) (orders under §210.720 not appealable; permanency plan changes not final judgments)
  • Glick Finley LLC v. Glick, 310 S.W.3d 713 (Mo.App. E.D.2010) (right to appeal is statutory)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In the Interest of T.G.O.
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 6, 2012
Citations: 360 S.W.3d 355; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 267; 2012 WL 705793; No. ED 95829
Docket Number: No. ED 95829
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
Log In