In the Interest of S.W., Minor Child
21-0843
| Iowa Ct. App. | Jan 12, 2022Background
- S.W. born Dec. 2019; mother reported alcohol and long-term methamphetamine, cocaine, and marijuana use. Newborn concerns included failure to thrive and suspected fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD).
- Child missed medical care: mother missed or rescheduled 18 medical visits in first 10 months; child required hospitalization and further diagnostic testing mother did not acknowledge.
- Mother exhibited mental-health symptoms (visual hallucinations, paranoia) at some appointments and has a prior termination of parental rights for another child tied to long-term meth use.
- After removal in Oct. 2020, S.W. tested positive for methamphetamine, marijuana, and cocaine; mother admitted post-birth meth use but refused consistent drug screens and substance-abuse treatment.
- Juvenile court adjudicated S.W. CINA; permanency plan required substance-abuse evaluation, mental-health treatment, and random drug screens; mother made minimal, inconsistent progress and denied the FASD diagnosis.
- Court modified goal to termination; trial court terminated mother’s parental rights under Iowa Code §232.116(1)(g) and (h), focusing on (1)(h)(4): child could not safely be returned now or within six months. Mother appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Mother's Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether §232.116(1)(h)(4) was proved: child could not be returned to mother now | Mother argues she showed reduced meth use and appropriate supervised visits; thus child could safely be returned | State argues mother refused treatment and drug screens, has chronic substance and mental-health issues, failed to address child’s medical needs including FASD | Court affirmed: clear and convincing evidence supports (1)(h)(4); mother not ready to resume custody |
| Whether court should grant a six-month extension of placement | Mother asks for six months to complete therapy and stabilize supports | State argues mother made almost no progress and nothing shows removal need would end in six months | Court denied extension: no record support that six months would eliminate removal need |
| Whether mother’s claim that DHS failed to make reasonable reunification efforts bars termination | Mother claims insufficient DHS efforts | State and court note parent must request additional services and did not; claim was waived | Court treated claim as waived per Iowa precedent |
Key Cases Cited
- In re A.B., 957 N.W.2d 280 (Iowa 2021) (de novo review; State must prove grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence)
- In re D.W., 791 N.W.2d 703 (Iowa 2010) (termination may be affirmed on any ground supported by record)
- In re A.M., 843 N.W.2d 100 (Iowa 2014) (parent must be ready to resume custody by termination hearing)
- In re A.B., 815 N.W.2d 764 (Iowa 2012) (unresolved chronic drug addiction can render parent unfit)
- In re C.B., 611 N.W.2d 489 (Iowa 2000) (statutory urgency for termination after required period; special concern for children under three)
- In re A.C., 415 N.W.2d 609 (Iowa 1987) (court should consider limited time children have to reach permanency when weighing extensions)
- In re A.A.G., 708 N.W.2d 85 (Iowa Ct. App. 2005) (reasonable-efforts claim may be waived if parent fails to request additional services)
