In the Interest of N.M., Minor Child, M.K., Mother
17-0054
| Iowa Ct. App. | Mar 22, 2017Background
- Child N.M., born April 2014, was removed from mother in Nov. 2015 after mother admitted methamphetamine use; child initially placed with maternal grandmother.
- Mother has long history of mental-health diagnoses (borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression, postpartum depression) and prior hospitalizations; she attended therapy and made some progress but required continued treatment.
- Mother relapsed on methamphetamine in Oct. 2015 and again in Aug. 2016; diagnosed with severe stimulant use disorder and failed to complete recommended extended outpatient treatment.
- Supervised visits showed mother affectionate but had safety lapses (child put coins, cigarette butts, medications in mouth); mother allowed a registered sex offender boyfriend to move in despite DHS warnings.
- Mother has criminal-history convictions and outstanding warrants; at time of termination hearing she faced likely incarceration; juvenile court terminated parental rights under Iowa Code § 232.116(1)(h).
Issues
| Issue | Mother’s Argument | State’s Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether statutory ground § 232.116(1)(h)(4) was met (child could not be returned at time of hearing) | Mother: N.M. could be returned; she’d made progress in therapy and bonded with child | State: Recent relapse, severe substance disorder, treatment non‑completion, safety lapses, and allowing a sex offender in home show child could not be safely returned | Court: Held clear and convincing evidence child could not be returned; ground proven |
| Whether termination is contrary to child’s best interests under § 232.116(2) | Mother: Strong bond with child weighs against termination | State: Primary attachment is to maternal grandmother; stability and safety outweigh bond | Court: Held termination is in child’s best interests |
| Whether permissive factor § 232.116(3)(a) (relative guardianship) precludes termination | Mother: Grandmother has custody; guardianship is less severe alternative | State: Guardianship not legally preferred; no evidence grandmother willing to be guardian | Court: Held permissive factor did not weigh against termination |
| Whether juvenile court erred given mother’s improvements | Mother: Therapy progress and coping strategies show readiness for reunification | State: Improvements insufficient given ongoing substance disorder, safety concerns, and likely incarceration | Court: Held progress insufficient for reunification at hearing |
Key Cases Cited
- In re M.W., 876 N.W.2d 212 (Iowa 2016) (standard of review and approach to termination appeals)
- In re L.M.F., 490 N.W.2d 66 (Iowa Ct. App. 1992) (placement under permanency orders not preferred over termination when termination is supported)
- In re C.K., 558 N.W.2d 170 (Iowa 1997) (ability of relative to care for child does not automatically prevent termination)
- In re A.M., 843 N.W.2d 100 (Iowa 2014) (factors in § 232.116(3) are permissive, not mandatory)
