History
  • No items yet
midpage
315 Ga. App. 673
Ga. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Juvenile court found M. M. and M. M. deprived and awarded temporary custody to father in 2011 disposition.
  • Mother left the children with father in July 2010 and did not visit or pay support for five months before the deprivation petition.
  • Father filed deprivation petition in November 2010; paternity testing supported the father's belief the twins were his children.
  • Mother had unstable housing, limited employment, and allegedly used a twin's disability benefits for her own bills.
  • Guardian ad litem expressed concerns about the mother's arrests, failure to appear in court, and unstable living situation.
  • Adjudication found present deprivation and the disposition order contemplated mother’s post-incarceration involvement.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the deprivation action was properly within juvenile court jurisdiction Mother argues action is disguised custody by noncustodial parent. State contends petition shows deprivation under OCGA § 15-11-2 (8) (A) and jurisdiction is proper. Jurisdiction affirmed; petition supported by deprivation allegations.
Whether the evidence supports present deprivation by clear and convincing standard Mother asserts evidence relates only to past deprivation, not present. State argues present deprivation shown by mother’s ongoing instability and recent conduct. Affirmed; evidence supports present deprivation under OCGA § 15-11-2 (8) (A).

Key Cases Cited

  • In the Interest of K. L. H., 281 Ga. App. 394, 636 SE2d 117 (Ga. App. 2006) (deprivation proper if petition alleges present deprivation)
  • In the Interest of W. W., 308 Ga. App. 407, 707 SE2d 611 (Ga. App. 2011) (standard for deprivation findings; supports review of evidence)
  • In the Interest of M. L. C., 249 Ga. App. 435, 548 SE2d 137 (Ga. App. 2001) (deprivation finding authorized where parent’s conduct shows neglect)
  • In the Interest of D. Q., 307 Ga. App. 121, 704 SE2d 444 (Ga. App. 2010) (deprivation upheld where parent’s failure to meet needs)
  • In the Interest of K. R. S., 253 Ga. App. 678, 560 SE2d 292 (Ga. App. 2002) (valid deprivation allegations required; not a custody dispute)
  • In the Interest of K. L. H., 269 Ga. App. 567, 604 SE2d 623 (Ga. App. 2004) (consider past conduct and stability when assessing deprivation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In the Interest of M. M.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 19, 2012
Citations: 315 Ga. App. 673; 727 S.E.2d 279; A12A0260
Docket Number: A12A0260
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
Log In
    In the Interest of M. M., 315 Ga. App. 673