In the Interest of K.D.-c., and R.C., Minor Children, K.C., Mother
17-0029
| Iowa Ct. App. | Mar 8, 2017Background
- Mother used methamphetamine; older child R.C. ingested methamphetamine and was removed Oct 2015; mother tested positive for meth while pregnant with K.D.-C.; infant removed at discharge after birth Nov 2015.
- Both children adjudicated children in need of assistance and placed with paternal grandparents.
- DHS offered services (drug screens, treatment referrals, visitation) beginning Oct 2015; mother repeatedly missed screens or tested positive and admitted daily IV meth use as late as Oct 2016.
- Mother’s last contact with children was July 2016; she declined further visitation until she stopped using drugs; by Dec 2016 her whereabouts were unknown.
- District court terminated mother’s parental rights under multiple subsections of Iowa Code § 232.116(1); mother appealed alleging insufficient evidence and inadequate services.
- Court of Appeals affirmed termination, relying on § 232.116(1)(h) (young children removed for at least six months and cannot be returned).
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether clear and convincing evidence supports termination under §232.116(1)(h) | Mother: evidence inadequate to show children cannot be returned now | State: mother’s continued substance use, failure to participate, unstable housing show children cannot be returned | Held: Affirmed; record shows mother failed to abstain and children cannot be returned |
| Whether DHS provided reasonable services to reunify family | Mother: services were inadequate to assist reunification | State: a host of services were offered; mother didn’t request additional services or engage | Held: Mother’s general complaints not preserved; services were adequate on record |
| Whether termination was in children’s best interests | Mother: (implicit) termination not appropriate given potential for reunification | State/guardian: children bonded with grandparents; instability and parental absence harm children | Held: District court’s best-interest finding affirmed |
| Whether mother preserved challenge to services on appeal | Mother: argues services insufficient on appeal | State: parent must demand needed services before termination hearing; issue not preserved | Held: Not preserved; parent bears responsibility to request services prior to hearing |
Key Cases Cited
- In re D.W., 791 N.W.2d 703 (Iowa 2010) (appellate court may affirm termination on any sustained statutory ground)
- In re H.S., 805 N.W.2d 737 (Iowa 2011) (scope of review for termination appeals is de novo)
- In re C.H., 652 N.W.2d 144 (Iowa 2002) (parent must request needed services prior to termination hearing to preserve claim)
