History
  • No items yet
midpage
In the Interest of J.J., Minor Child, C.J., Mother, B.J., Father
17-0603
| Iowa Ct. App. | Jun 21, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • DHS removed J.J. from parental care in Dec. 2015 after both parents tested positive for methamphetamine; child placed with a maternal relative.
  • Parents were adjudicated CINA in Feb. 2016; both failed to complete recommended substance-abuse treatment, obtain stable housing, employment, or engage in mental-health care.
  • Parents were asked to leave the home in Jan. 2016 and never resumed custody. By Jan. 2017 they lived with a registered sex offender.
  • State filed petitions to terminate both parents’ rights in Feb. 2017; termination hearing held March 2017.
  • Juvenile court terminated both parents under Iowa Code § 232.116(1)(h), finding the child could not be returned, additional time unlikely to help, and a relative placement available for adoption.
  • Parents appealed, arguing (1) defective service/denial of procedural due process and (2) insufficient proof for termination and applicability of statutory exceptions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (State) Defendant's Argument (Parents) Held
Adequacy of service / procedural due process Service was adequate and parents received notice of the petition Service proofs initially showed assistant county attorney signed service in violation of rule 1.302(4); denial of due process Record showed parents received notice; amended proofs corrected error; no reversible due-process violation
Grounds for termination under § 232.116(1)(h) — child cannot be returned now Child under 3, adjudicated CINA, removed >6 months, and cannot be safely returned due to parents’ untreated substance abuse, lack of housing, employment, and mental-health care Parents contend they cooperated and sought evaluations; father asked for more time to complete treatment and recover from surgery Clear and convincing evidence supports element that child could not be returned at time of hearing; statutory grounds proven
Best interests under § 232.116(2) Termination serves child’s safety and need for permanent stable home; relative placement provides permanency Parents argued bond and relative placement should favor preserving rights Court found child’s safety and need for permanency favored termination; relative adoptive placement weighed for termination
Application of statutory exceptions § 232.116(3) (placement with relative, parent–child bond) Exceptions are permissive; even with relative placement and bond, termination appropriate given best interests Parents urged exceptions should save relationship Court declined to apply exceptions; termination affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • In re A.B., 815 N.W.2d 764 (Iowa 2012) (standard of review for termination appeals)
  • In re D.W., 791 N.W.2d 703 (Iowa 2010) (clear-and-convincing standard and analysis of “at the present time” returnability)
  • In re K.M., 653 N.W.2d 602 (Iowa 2002) (parents’ right to notice and opportunity to be heard)
  • In re C.B., 611 N.W.2d 489 (Iowa 2000) (urgency of permanency and limits on delaying termination)
  • In re T.J.O., 527 N.W.2d 417 (Iowa Ct. App. 1994) (children cannot wait for parental rehabilitation)
  • In re D.A., 506 N.W.2d 478 (Iowa Ct. App. 1993) (parental problems cannot suspend children’s development)
  • In re A.M., 843 N.W.2d 100 (Iowa 2014) (permanency importance and limits on delaying)
  • In re J.E., 723 N.W.2d 793 (Iowa 2006) (safety and permanent home as defining elements of best interest)
  • In re R.L., 541 N.W.2d 900 (Iowa Ct. App. 1995) (termination preferable to long-term foster care)
  • In re R.J., 436 N.W.2d 630 (Iowa 1989) (legislative time limits for reunification)
  • In re J.L.W., 570 N.W.2d 778 (Iowa Ct. App. 1997) (section 232.116(3) factors are permissive)
  • In re P.L., 778 N.W.2d 33 (Iowa 2010) (overruling on other grounds regarding permissive factors)
  • In re D.S., 806 N.W.2d 458 (Iowa Ct. App. 2011) (court’s discretion in applying section 232.116(3))
  • In re S.R., 600 N.W.2d 63 (Iowa Ct. App. 1999) (parent’s obligation to request different/additional services)
  • In re C.H., 652 N.W.2d 144 (Iowa 2002) (failure to request additional services waives reasonable-efforts claim)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In the Interest of J.J., Minor Child, C.J., Mother, B.J., Father
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Iowa
Date Published: Jun 21, 2017
Docket Number: 17-0603
Court Abbreviation: Iowa Ct. App.