in the Interest of I.C.G., a Child
05-14-01629-CV
| Tex. App. | Jun 1, 2015Background
- Child (I.C.G.) born 2004; Mother and Father were not married. Parents signed an Acknowledgment of Paternity in December 2004.
- In 2007 a trial court appointed Mother and Father joint managing conservators and ordered Father to pay child support; various custody/support disputes followed.
- In 2013 Child filed (through Mother as next friend) a petition challenging the paternity acknowledgment, alleging another man (E.H.) is the biological father and seeking name change; alternatively sought involuntary termination of Father under Tex. Fam. Code §161.001(1)(D) and (E).
- Trial court suspended Father’s possession and child-support obligations, appointed an amicus attorney for the child, and later conducted a bench trial on termination.
- Trial court terminated Father’s parental rights under subsection (D); ordered Mother to initiate a suit to adjudicate E.H. as father and permitted birth-certificate name change.
- Father appealed arguing lack of standing/subject-matter jurisdiction, insufficiency of evidence, and trial error; Court of Appeals stayed parts of the termination order and addressed jurisdiction first.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court had jurisdiction to terminate Father’s parental rights because Child (through Mother as next friend) lacked standing | Child (via Mother) sought termination and asserted the suit was brought by the child through his guardian/next friend | Father argued the amended petition did not plead a statutory basis giving the child standing to seek involuntary termination; standing is required for subject-matter jurisdiction | Court held Child lacked standing as pleaded; trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction; termination order vacated and petition dismissed |
Key Cases Cited
- In re M.K.S.-V., 301 S.W.3d 460 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009) (standing is a jurisdictional prerequisite; petitioner must allege facts showing jurisdiction)
- In re E.G.L., 378 S.W.3d 542 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012) (party seeking relief in SAPCR must plead and establish standing under Family Code)
