History
  • No items yet
midpage
2020 COA 152
Colo. Ct. App.
2020
Read the full case

Background

  • Father (S.M.M.) filed a Colorado paternity action under the Uniform Parentage Act (UPA) before the child was born; both parents lived in Colorado at filing.
  • A magistrate entered a pre-birth paternity judgment and adopted the parents’ stipulated parenting plan; a permanent-orders hearing was scheduled.
  • Mother (L.M.D.) moved to New Hampshire before the child’s birth; the child was born in New Hampshire and has never lived in Colorado.
  • Mother moved to dismiss Colorado’s custody orders for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and opened a New Hampshire custody proceeding; New Hampshire stayed its case pending resolution.
  • The juvenile court affirmed the paternity judgment but vacated Colorado’s custody/allocation order, concluding Colorado lacked UCCJEA jurisdiction to make an initial child-custody determination for a child who never resided in Colorado.
  • Father appealed; the Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the juvenile court’s decision.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Father) Defendant's Argument (Mother) Held
Whether a paternity action filed pre-birth under the UPA supplies Colorado jurisdiction to make a child-custody (parental-responsibilities) determination despite the UCCJEA Filing under the UPA before birth granted Colorado authority to allocate parental responsibilities as part of the paternity proceeding UCCJEA provides the exclusive jurisdictional rules for initial child-custody determinations; UPA does not authorize pre-birth custody orders Held for Mother: UCCJEA governs initial custody jurisdiction; UPA may permit pre-birth paternity filings but does not authorize pre-birth custody allocations
Whether the UCCJEA furnishes jurisdiction over an unborn child or a child who never lived in Colorado (home-state analysis) Home-state analysis should be fixed at filing; Colorado acquired jurisdiction when parents lived here and action was filed Home state is determined by where the child has lived since birth; an unborn child cannot have a home state and thus UCCJEA does not support Colorado jurisdiction here Held for Mother: Home-state inquiry depends on post-birth residence; UCCJEA does not provide jurisdiction over unborn children or children who never resided in Colorado
Whether the temporary injunction restraining removal applied to the unborn child and whether mother violated it by leaving the state while pregnant The injunction issued at filing (pre-birth) should prevent mother from removing the child once born; mother violated the injunction by relocating The temporary restraint applies to a "minor child" and does not operate against an unborn child; a child born out of state and never in Colorado cannot be restrained by it Held for Mother: Injunction does not reach an unborn child; magistrate’s apparent finding of a violation was properly reviewed but did not confer custody jurisdiction
Whether mother is entitled to attorney fees under § 14-10-119 following dismissal of custody claims (N/A) Mother requested fees under § 14-10-119 Denied: § 14-10-119 does not govern fee awards in Children’s Code paternity proceedings; different statute (§ 19-4-117) applies

Key Cases Cited

  • N.A.H. v. S.L.S., 9 P.3d 354 (Colo. 2000) (UPA governs parentage determinations; paternity decides legal parentage distinct from custody).
  • Nistico v. District Court, 791 P.2d 1128 (Colo. 1990) (home-state custody analysis is based on where child has lived since birth).
  • In re Marriage of Tonnessen, 937 P.2d 863 (Colo. App. 1996) (court lacked custody jurisdiction where child never resided in Colorado).
  • DeWitt v. Lechuga, 393 S.W.3d 113 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013) (UCCJEA does not limit jurisdiction to determine paternity or child support; UCCJEA applies to custody/visitation aspects).
  • Gray v. Gray, 139 So. 3d 802 (Ala. Civ. App. 2013) (UCCJEA does not provide jurisdiction over unborn child).
  • In re Custody of Kalbes, 733 N.W.2d 648 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007) (home-state determination looks to where child lived from birth; conception location insufficient).
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: in the Interest of G.C.M.M
Court Name: Colorado Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 29, 2020
Citations: 2020 COA 152; 477 P.3d 792; 19CA2326, People
Docket Number: 19CA2326, People
Court Abbreviation: Colo. Ct. App.
Log In
    in the Interest of G.C.M.M, 2020 COA 152