in the Interest of G.S. and J. W., Children
12-15-00210-CV
| Tex. App. | Dec 16, 2015Background
- Mother J.N. had two children (G.S., b.2006; J.W., b.2014). The Department filed for protection, conservatorship, and termination on July 30, 2014; Department was named temporary sole managing conservator.
- Parties attended mediation on July 13, 2015 and signed a mediated settlement agreement (MSA) providing J.N. would execute an affidavit relinquishing parental rights; MSA included explicit acknowledgments that J.N. signed voluntarily and without mediator legal advice.
- J.N. executed an affidavit of voluntary relinquishment consenting to the Department’s placement and adoption of the children; the trial court terminated J.N.’s parental rights under Tex. Fam. Code §161.001(b)(1)(K) and (b)(2) on July 15, 2015.
- On appeal J.N., proceeding pro se, argued the relinquishment was coerced/fraudulent and that the mediator gave legal advice; she did not obtain or pay for the reporter’s record and did not appear at hearings on her pauper’s oath.
- The appellate court treated the appeal as submitted on the clerk’s record alone and applied the presumption that missing reporter’s-record evidence supports the trial court’s findings; it found the trial court implicitly found the affidavit voluntary and affirmed termination.
Issues
| Issue | J.N.’s Argument | Department’s Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Voluntariness of affidavit of relinquishment | J.N. says she was coerced, misled, or given legal advice by the mediator and thus did not voluntarily sign the affidavit | The MSA and affidavit contain explicit written acknowledgments of voluntariness, no evidence in the clerk’s record shows coercion | Court held affidavit was voluntary; termination affirmed (trial court found affidavit executed pursuant to §161.001) |
| Effect of absent reporter’s record on appeal | N/A (J.N. failed to secure reporter’s record) | Lack of reporter’s record requires presumption that the missing evidence supports the trial court’s ruling; written findings in judgment are probative | Court applied presumption, relied on trial court’s findings and clerk’s record, overruled J.N.’s issue, and affirmed judgment |
Key Cases Cited
- Bryant v. United Shortline Inc. Assurance Servs., N.A., 972 S.W.2d 26 (Tex. 1998) (missing reporter’s record presumed to support trial court’s judgment)
- In re Marriage of Spiegel, 6 S.W.3d 643 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1999) (same presumption regarding missing reporter’s record)
- In re C.A.B., 289 S.W.3d 874 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2009) (findings in judgment have probative value when reporter’s record is absent)
- In re K.M.L., 443 S.W.3d 101 (Tex. 2014) (an involuntary affidavit of relinquishment is a complete defense to termination under §161.001(b)(1)(K))
