History
  • No items yet
midpage
311 Ga. App. 629
Ga. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Mother, 17, was in Baldwin DFACS custody at birth of A. B. and DFACS also took custody of A. B. at birth; deprivation petition filed on December 7, 2006 and temporary custody ordered for 12 months.
  • S. B. was born March 12, 2009 and placed in Baldwin DFACS custody, residing in a foster home with A. B.
  • A. B. was diagnosed with expressive language disorder and later ADHD with a consideration of autism; further psychiatric evaluation was recommended.
  • September 10, 2009 the mother voluntarily surrendered parental rights but withdrew the surrender on September 14, 2009; DFACS proceeded with termination.
  • DFACS filed its petition to terminate on October 15, 2009; a termination hearing was set for December 29, 2009; before full hearing, the mother signed a written consent to terminate her rights as to A. B., and the court entered an order January 8, 2010 based on that consent and stipulations.
  • The juvenile court terminated the mother's rights to A. B. and granted six months to demonstrate the ability to regain custody of S. B., finding noncompliance with a case plan.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the consent to terminate knowing and voluntary? Miller Miller Consent voluntary and knowing; affirmed termination
Does OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(12) discretionary appeal violate due process? Miller argues due process violation State argues no due process violation Discretionary appeal does not violate due process; affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • In the Interest of N. A. U. E., 287 Ga. 797 (2010) (upholds constitutionality of discretionary appeal in termination cases)
  • In the Interest of T. C. R., 281 Ga. App. 517 (2006) (no grace period to withdraw voluntary surrender under termination statutes)
  • In the Interest of K. N., 272 Ga. App. 45 (2005) (standard of review for termination of parental rights)
  • In the Interest of K. W., 291 Ga. App. 623 (2008) (fraud elements in surrender/consent contexts)
  • In the Interest of A. C., 285 Ga. 829 (2009) (limited exception allowing appellate review of constitutionality of appellate-procedure statute)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In the Interest of A. B.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 8, 2011
Citations: 311 Ga. App. 629; 716 S.E.2d 755; 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 2892; 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 801; A11A1281
Docket Number: A11A1281
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
Log In