In the Interest of A.B., Minor Child
956 N.W.2d 162
| Iowa Ct. App. | 2022Background
- A.B., a child under three, was removed from parental custody and the State sought termination of both parents’ rights under Iowa Code § 232.116(1)(h).
- The parents have long histories of substance abuse, including methamphetamine; both refused drug screens in Jan 2021 and later tested positive for methamphetamine in Feb 2021.
- A.B. initially tested positive for methamphetamine at case outset and has ongoing, serious health and developmental needs requiring regular medical appointments and therapies.
- While in parents’ care, required therapies were not consistently completed and parents missed many medical appointments after placement in foster care.
- The juvenile court admitted the Feb 2021 drug-test results; both parents appealed termination and challenged the admission (foundation/hearsay) and sufficiency of evidence that A.B. could not be returned safely.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether § 232.116(1)(h) element — child cannot be returned at present — was proven | Parents: insufficient evidence that child could not be safely returned | State: ongoing meth use (including refused tests presumed positive and Feb 2021 positives) + missed medical care for A.B. make return unsafe | Affirmed. Clear and convincing evidence child could not be returned |
| Admissibility/authentication of Feb 2021 drug-test results | Mother: tests lack foundation/inaccurate; Father: hearsay and lack of foundation | State: technicians and lab supervisor testified to collection, testing, and identification; business-records exception applied | Admission upheld as adequately authenticated; even if excluded, record still supports termination |
| Mother's claim of lack of reasonable efforts toward reunification | Mother: State failed to provide reasonable efforts (relies on materials from 2018) | State/Court: those materials are not in the appellate record so claim is unpreserved/unsupported | Court declined to consider due to lack of record; argument not addressed on merits |
Key Cases Cited
- In re J.S., 846 N.W.2d 36 (Iowa 2014) (parental methamphetamine use creates dangerous environment for children)
- State v. Musser, 721 N.W.2d 734 (Iowa 2006) (authentication and foundation for laboratory/testing evidence)
- State v. Dessinger, 958 N.W.2d 590 (Iowa 2021) (standard of review for hearsay rulings)
- Bremicker v. MCI Telecomm. Corp., 420 N.W.2d 427 (Iowa 1988) (trial court discretionary rulings presumed correct)
- Cass Cnty. v. Audubon Cnty., 266 N.W. 293 (Iowa 1936) (presumption that court action is regular and lawful)
