History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Z.D.
2012 Ohio 3658
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Z.D., born Dec 2009, tested positive for THC at birth and was placed with relatives; later placement with Ashanti Ginn, a trained foster-to-adopt social worker.
  • RCCS filed a dependency/abuse petition in 2010; trial court found Z.D. dependent and awarded temporary custody to Ginn with RCCS supervision.
  • In 2011 RCCS sought legal custody for Ginn; CASA/GAL moved for RCCS permanent custody despite RCCS position for Ginn.
  • Permanent custody evidentiary hearing held on Dec 2, 2011; magistrate awarded permanent custody to RCCS; trial court denied objections in 2012.
  • Appellant Brown (in custody) challenges: denial of continuance, sufficiency of evidence for permanent custody, and denial of RCCS’s motion for Ginn’s legal custody.
  • Ginn has foster-to-adopt certification; mother Nicole Davis largely stopped contact with Z.D.; Brown incarcerated for murder and expected to remain so for 18 more years.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did the court abuse discretion denying a continuance? Brown asserts need for delay due to incarceration and mother’s absence. Ginn/RCCS notes no legitimate basis for delay; substantial delay not intended by statute. No abuse; denial affirmed.
Was permanent custody to RCCS supported by clear and convincing evidence and in Z.D.'s best interest? Brown argues insufficient evidence to support custody to the agency. RCCS/guardian argues abandonment and failure to remedy conditions, plus best interests favor RCCS. Supported by clear and convincing evidence; best interests favored RCCS.
Was denial of RCCS’s motion for legal custody to Ginn erroneous? Brown contends Ginn should have legal custody instead of permanent custody to RCCS. Agency and GAL contend best interests and statutory standards support denial of Ginn’s legal custody. Not erroneous; denial upheld.

Key Cases Cited

  • Hartt v. Munobe, 67 Ohio St.3d 3 (1993) (continuance decision within trial court discretion)
  • Unger, 67 Ohio St.2d 65 (1981) (criteria for reviewing continuance denials)
  • In re P.T., 2012-Ohio-1287 (Stark App. 2012) (appellate factors for continuance in juvenile cases)
  • In re Nice, 141 Ohio App.3d 445 (2001) (preponderance standard in legal custody matters)
  • Seasons Coal Co. v. Cleveland, 10 Ohio St.3d 77 (1984) (credibility and governing standard for review of findings)
  • C.E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction, 54 Ohio St.2d 279 (1978) (appellate court defers to trial court credibility findings)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Z.D.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 14, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 3658
Docket Number: 12 CA 29
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.