In re: Woodley
290 Va. 482
| Va. | 2015Background
- Four-year-old Jameer Woodley was killed in a 2009 school-bus accident; his parents qualified as co-administrators of his estate and filed a wrongful-death suit.
- A jury awarded wrongful-death damages to statutory beneficiaries, including two minor brothers: Jaylon (age 12) $750,000 and Jaleel (age 5) $200,000.
- Parents (also the personal representatives) submitted proposed irrevocable, professionally managed trusts for each minor, with an independent trust company as trustee and no continuing parental control.
- The trial court rejected the proposed trusts and ordered the minors’ awards deposited with the clerk of court (into a low-yield bank account).
- Parents appealed, arguing the trial court lacked authority to divert awards from the personal representatives to the clerk.
- The Supreme Court of Virginia reversed, ordering payment to the personal representatives for distribution consistent with statutory duties.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court could order wrongful-death awards to minors paid to the clerk instead of the personal representative | Parents: trial court erred; Code § 8.01-54(C) requires payment to personal representative who may then distribute (including by creating professionally managed trusts) | Court/Clerk: placing funds with clerk protects minors and permits supervised custody of funds | Reversed: statute mandates awards be paid to the personal representative; trial court lacked authority to preemptively divert funds to clerk |
| Whether trial court has routine supervisory authority to dictate distribution method for minors’ wrongful-death awards | Parents: personal representative has fiduciary duty and discretion to establish trusts without preemptive court control | Court/Clerk: judicial oversight may be appropriate to protect minors’ interests | Held: No statutory authorization for proactive court direction of distributions; supervisory power only arises if reasonable suspicion of fiduciary breach (not present here) |
Key Cases Cited
- Wilson v. Whittaker, 207 Va. 1032, 154 S.E.2d 124 (1967) (discusses the statutory origin and nature of wrongful-death actions)
- Johnston Mem’l Hosp. v. Bazemore, 277 Va. 308, 672 S.E.2d 858 (2009) (wrongful-death action must be brought by personal representative)
- Antisdel v. Ashby, 279 Va. 42, 688 S.E.2d 163 (2010) (personal representative’s role described in fiduciary terms)
- Virginia Trust Co. v. Evans, 193 Va. 425, 69 S.E.2d 409 (1952) (personal representative holds position of trust and must exercise utmost good faith)
- Owens v. Owens, 196 Va. 966, 86 S.E.2d 181 (1955) (recognizes fiduciary obligations of personal representatives)
- Patterson v. Anderson, 194 Va. 557, 74 S.E.2d 195 (1953) (fiduciary liability for breach of duties)
- Fisher v. Tails, Inc., 289 Va. 69, 767 S.E.2d 710 (2015) (applies expressio unius canon of statutory interpretation)
