midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
301 Ga. 901
Ga.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • West admitted the same underlying facts as in prior petitions.
  • In 2014, an individual paid West $3,500 to represent her Guatemalan-son in an immigration matter; West prepared asylum papers.
  • West signed the client’s name on the asylum application and supporting documents, including a perjury-attestation, without the client’s signature in the client’s language.
  • West claimed he intended to supplement with the client’s real signature later and relied on anticipated amendments.
  • Prior petitions were rejected; the renewed petition sought a Review Panel reprimand for admitted violations of Rules 1.2(a) and 1.4, among others.
  • The Bar recommended a Review Panel reprimand, agreeing West did not prove a Rule 8.4(a)(4) intent element, and the court ultimately accepted a sanction of a Review Panel reprimand for admitted violations of Rules 1.2(a) and 1.4.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether West violated 1.2(a) and 1.4 based on admitted facts West violated 1.2(a) and 1.4 by failing to adequately communicate and consult Bar contends the admitted facts support 1.2(a) and 1.4 violations Yes; violations established; sanctions appropriate for 1.2(a) and 1.4
Whether Rule 8.4(a)(4) was proven West argues no intent to deceive; 8.4(4) not proven Bar asserts 8.4(a)(4) could be proven Not proven; court rejects finding of 8.4(a)(4) violation
Appropriate sanction for the admitted violations West seeks Review Panel reprimand; mitigating factors support this Bar agrees on reprimand but disputes severity Review Panel reprimand appropriate; sanction for 1.2(a) and 1.4 established

Key Cases Cited

  • In the Matter of Morse, 266 Ga. 652 (Ga. 1996) (ABA standards guide sanctions; suspension not automatic)
  • In the Matter of Woodham, 296 Ga. 618 (Ga. 2015) (8.4(a)(4) requires intent; evidentiary standard discussed)
  • In the Matter of Suttle, 288 Ga. 14 (Ga. 2010) (attendant considerations in discipline; honesty issues)
  • In the Matter of Davis, 291 Ga. 169 (Ga. 2012) (discusses aggravating factors in discipline)
  • In the Matter of Eddings, 300 Ga. 419 (Ga. 2016) (aggravation and mitigation in sanctions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re West
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Aug 28, 2017
Citations: 301 Ga. 901; 804 S.E.2d 340; 2017 Ga. LEXIS 693; S17Y1684
Docket Number: S17Y1684
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
Log In