midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
546 B.R. 836
Bankr. D. Minn.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtor filed Chapter 7 on August 31, 2015 and listed her parents' home as her address; she did not list any ownership or claim a homestead exemption on initial schedules.
  • Within 180 days after the petition date, the debtor’s father died; soon after, the mother died (November 2015). The mother’s will left the residuary estate equally to her children; no specific devise of the house was made.
  • After the parents’ deaths, the debtor continued to live in the home and, on December 29, 2015, amended Schedule A to list a one-third ownership interest and amended Schedule C to claim a $212,500 homestead exemption under Minnesota law.
  • The Chapter 7 trustee objected, arguing exemption eligibility is determined as of the petition date and the debtor had no ownership interest then; trustee conceded the debtor occupied the home on the petition date.
  • Debtor argued the exemption should be determined when the interest became property of the estate (i.e., upon inheritance within 180 days), invoking 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(5) and § 522(a)(2) principles about after-acquired property.
  • The bankruptcy court concluded the debtor’s interest became property of the estate upon inheritance within 180 days and held exemption eligibility is determined as of that date; trustee’s objection overruled and the one-third interest was exempted.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a debtor must own property on the petition date to claim a state homestead exemption Trustee: exemptions assessed as of petition date; debtor lacked ownership then so ineligible Debtor: when property is acquired by bequest within 180 days, exemption is assessed when interest becomes property of the estate Court: exemption eligibility for property acquired by bequest/devise/inheritance within 180 days is determined when the interest becomes property of the estate

Key Cases Cited

  • White v. Stump, 266 U.S. 310 (1924) (explains petition date as focal point for fixing estate rights under prior law but reasoning allows focusing on the time the interest enters the estate)
  • In re Smoinikar, 200 B.R. 640 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1996) (used petition date to determine exemption where property was estate property at filing)
  • In re Cutignola, 450 B.R. 445 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011) (allowed exemption in property inherited after filing; § 522 does not limit exemptions to property owned at filing)
  • In re Beachside I Homeowners Ass’n, 802 N.W.2d 771 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011) (Minnesota law: title to decedent’s real property passes to heirs by operation of probate code without need for probate proceeding)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Walz
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota
Date Published: Mar 15, 2016
Citations: 546 B.R. 836; 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 827; 2016 WL 1019247; BKY 15-43077
Docket Number: BKY 15-43077
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. D. Minn.
Log In