History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.L.L.
2011 Minn. App. LEXIS 82
| Minn. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • J.L.L. gave birth to K.L.L. on May 3, 2010, prompting an expedited TPR petition by Morrison County Social Services.
  • The county previously sought termination of J.L.L.’s rights to her first three children, which had resulted in presumptive palpable unfitness after involuntary terminations.
  • In 2010, during the TPR trial, J.L.L. consented to voluntary termination; the court did not issue a termination order at that hearing.
  • On September 22, 2010, J.L.L. revoked her consent in writing before any termination order was entered, claiming she felt pressured and did not understand what she signed.
  • The district court later permitted J.L.L. to withdraw her consent; the county challenged, and an evidentiary hearing followed.
  • In February 2011 the district court found that J.L.L. rebutted the presumption of palpable unfitness and denied the county’s petition to terminate.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether withdrawal of consent was permissible J.L.L. timely withdrew before any termination order. Withdrawal after good cause cannot occur once termination is ordered. Yes; withdrawal permitted before termination order.
Whether J.L.L. rebutted the presumption of palpable unfitness J.L.L. demonstrated fitness through sobriety, services, and progress with KL.L. County contends the presumption required clearer proof of fitness. Yes; evidence supported rebuttal of the presumption.
Whether the district court properly denied termination based on best interests Best interests favored keeping J.L.L. as KL.L.’s caregiver given stable environment and bonding. County argues criteria for best interests were not satisfied and termination was warranted. Yes; best interests favored not terminating.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Welfare of K.T., 327 N.W.2d 13 (Minn. 1982) (prior court-ordered termination requires fraud/duress/undue influence to vacate)
  • In re Welfare of L.A.F., 554 N.W.2d 393 (Minn. 1996) (we defer to trial court on credibility and weight of evidence)
  • In re Welfare of Ch. of W.L.P., 678 N.W.2d 703 (Minn. App. 2004) (termination standards; caution in appellate review)
  • In re Welfare of D.L.R.D., 656 N.W.2d 247 (Minn. App. 2003) (presumption of palpable unfitness; burden on parent to rebut)
  • In re Tanghe, 672 N.W.2d 623 (Minn. App. 2003) (require findings on child's best interests; remand for missing rationale)
  • In re Welfare of S.E.P., 744 N.W.2d 381 (Minn. 2008) (evidence standard and deference to trial court on factual findings)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re the Welfare of the Child of J.L.L.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Date Published: Jun 27, 2011
Citation: 2011 Minn. App. LEXIS 82
Docket Number: Nos. A11-354, A11-355
Court Abbreviation: Minn. Ct. App.