History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re the Marriage of Boysen
978 N.W.2d 97
Iowa Ct. App.
2022
Read the full case

Background

  • Marriage dissolution proceedings between Ann Marie Boysen (petitioner/appellee) and Chad William Boysen (respondent/appellant); appeal challenges a temporary financial order.
  • District court entered temporary joint legal and physical custody for three children (oldest declined to visit Ann).
  • Court found 2020 incomes: Chad $61,690 (from Boysen Grain & Livestock, director fees, rental income, and gun business); Ann $45,678 (school nurse/CTE instructor).
  • Court ordered Chad to pay $75/month child support, $1,000/month temporary spousal support, and $2,500 toward Ann’s temporary attorney fees.
  • Record consisted mainly of affidavits and support worksheets; parties disputed whether to use 2020 income or average income over three years and whether to impute higher income to Ann or credit cohabitant contributions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Ann) Defendant's Argument (Chad) Held
Child support amount Use actual 2020 incomes; guideline-based support, but accept reduced award Court should average Chad’s income over three years; impute more income to Ann Affirmed $75/month (court properly used 2020 income; guideline would be higher but parties accept lower amount)
Temporary spousal support Needs support based on pecuniary condition; other adult in household not legally obligated No need for alimony; cohabitant contributes; court failed to make §598.21A findings Affirmed $1,000/month (temporary awards governed by §598.11; §598.21A factors apply only to final orders; court’s credibility and pecuniary findings support award)
Temporary attorney fees Award reasonable given parties’ payments from joint funds Award was unreasonable Affirmed $2,500 to Ann (court’s factual findings supported award; not unreasonable)
Appellate attorney fees Each seeks fees on appeal Opposing party’s ability to pay/merits vary Denied to both (court declined discretionary award)

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Marriage of Mauer, 874 N.W.2d 103 (Iowa 2016) (de novo review of dissolution with weight to district court findings)
  • In re Marriage of Powell, 474 N.W.2d 531 (Iowa 1991) (determine monthly income from most reliable evidence; average fluctuating income when necessary)
  • In re Marriage of Nelson, 570 N.W.2d 103 (Iowa 1997) (include non-anomalous income when calculating support)
  • In re Marriage of Will, 602 N.W.2d 202 (Iowa Ct. App. 1999) (exclude non-recurring income)
  • In re Marriage of Schenkelberg, 824 N.W.2d 481 (Iowa 2012) (spousal support depends on circumstances and comparative earning capacities)
  • In re Marriage of Sullins, 715 N.W.2d 242 (Iowa 2006) (trial attorney fees reviewed for needs, ability to pay, and appeal merits)
  • In re Marriage of Erpelding, 917 N.W.2d 235 (Iowa 2018) (standard for overturning discretionary fee awards)
  • In re Marriage of McDermott, 827 N.W.2d 671 (Iowa 2013) (factors for awarding appellate attorney fees)
  • In re Marriage of Denly, 590 N.W.2d 48 (Iowa 1999) (temporary financial orders are final and appealable)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re the Marriage of Boysen
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Iowa
Date Published: Apr 13, 2022
Citation: 978 N.W.2d 97
Docket Number: 21-1355
Court Abbreviation: Iowa Ct. App.