In re the Marriage of: Chanel L. Welsh and Chris Welsh
34392-8
| Wash. Ct. App. | Dec 14, 2017Background
- Chris and Chanell Welsh divorced after separating in 2015; they have three children, including an infant with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS) requiring extensive medical care and breastfeeding.
- At trial, Chris worked full-time (32 hours/week) with gross monthly income ~$6,132; Chanell worked part-time (20 hours/week) with gross monthly income ~$2,654 and could earn ~$4,160 if she worked 32 hours/week.
- The trial court imputed Chanell's income at part-time (20 hours/week) because her caregiving for the special-needs infant made full-time work unreasonable, but also prepared an alternate support schedule based on both parents working 32 hours/week to take effect when the infant could have overnight visits with Chris.
- Chris sought a downward deviation in child support based on shared residential time with the two older children; the court postponed ruling on that deviation until Chanell could work full-time, citing the need to avoid leaving Chanell’s household with insufficient funds for the children’s basic needs.
- The dissolution decree, parenting plan, and child support order were entered April 1, 2016; Chris appealed the child support determinations and sought attorney fees.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (Welsh) | Defendant's Argument (Chanell) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether court properly imputed part-time income to Chanell | Court should impute full-time income; Chanell is underemployed | Underemployment is not voluntary given infant's special needs; part-time imputation appropriate | Imputation to part-time wages affirmed as not voluntary underemployment |
| Whether underemployment was voluntary | Implied: Chanell voluntarily limited work | Chanell limited work due to medical needs and breastfeeding; delegation unreasonable | Trial court discretion upheld; underemployment found not voluntary |
| Whether residential-time deviation should be granted now | Chris sought downward deviation for shared residential time | Deviation would leave Chanell's household with insufficient funds during her limited income period | Court properly postponed deviation until Chanell can work full-time |
| Whether attorney fees should be awarded on appeal | Chris requested fees | No legal basis shown to award fees to Chris | Request for attorney fees denied |
Key Cases Cited
- In re Marriage of Griffin, 114 Wn.2d 772 (1990) (standard for appellate review of child support orders)
- In re Parentage of O.A.J., 190 Wn. App. 826 (2015) (standard for reviewing factual findings and abuse of discretion in support matters)
- In re Marriage of Brockopp, 78 Wn. App. 441 (1995) (discussion treating voluntary underemployment analogous to voluntary unemployment)
