In Re the Marriage of Leora McGee v. Robert McGee
998 N.E.2d 270
| Ind. Ct. App. | 2013Background
- Husband and Wife married in 2009 and lived together until spring 2012; Husband later was placed in a nursing home while Wife was hospitalized.
- On June 28, 2012, Husband’s daughters, Sharon Hilton and Judith Kalajian, were appointed co-guardians of Husband’s person and estate.
- On August 2, 2012, the co-guardians filed a petition for dissolution of Husband’s marriage on his behalf; Wife filed a counter-petition.
- At the final hearing, the co-guardian testified she believed the marriage was irretrievably broken; Wife testified the marriage was not broken and she wished to remain married.
- The trial court granted the guardians’ petition on November 7, 2012; Wife appealed, and the Court of Appeals addressed whether a guardian has statutory authority to file for dissolution on behalf of a ward.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether a guardian may file a petition for dissolution of marriage on behalf of an incapacitated ward | Guardians argued they must be able to petition for dissolution to preserve the ward’s property and protect health and welfare (avoiding conflicts with guardian duties) | Wife argued Indiana statutes do not authorize a guardian to commence divorce proceedings for a ward; dissolution is a statutory personal right requiring the party’s verified petition | Court held guardian lacks statutory authority to file for dissolution on behalf of a ward; trial court erred in granting the petition |
Key Cases Cited
- State ex rel. Quear v. Madison Circuit Court, 99 N.E.2d 254 (1951) (holding no statutory authorization exists for a guardian to prosecute a divorce on behalf of an insane or incapacitated person)
- Elmer Buchta Trucking, Inc. v. Stanley, 744 N.E.2d 939 (Ind. 2001) (appellate courts independently review statutory interpretation)
- Robinson v. Gazvoda, 783 N.E.2d 1245 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003) (courts will not read into a statute powers not clearly expressed by the legislature)
