In re the Estate of Jason L. Patton
34590-4
| Wash. Ct. App. | Nov 16, 2017Background
- Decedent Jason Patton died intestate in 2014 owning a Union Gap residence subject to a recorded deed of trust held by Bank of America (successor to Countrywide) securing a home loan of about $115,000; the house had a lower fair market value (~$75,000).
- The probate court opened administration, appointed a personal representative and guardian ad litem for the minor heir, and the Estate gave creditor notice and claimed insolvency.
- Bank of America filed a creditor claim for the mortgage balance and the trustee scheduled a nonjudicial foreclosure sale.
- The Estate sought a probate order (under RCW 11.76.110) directing that administration expenses (attorney and guardian ad litem fees) be paid first from any sale proceeds of the residence, effectively asserting a super-priority over the deed of trust.
- The probate court granted the Estate priority; Bank of America appealed arguing the deed of trust and deed of trust act (RCW 61.24.080) control proceeds from a nonjudicial foreclosure and that the Estate has no statutory lien with super-priority.
Issues
| Issue | Estate's Argument | Bank of America’s Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether RCW 11.76.110 creates a lien or super-priority on proceeds of a nonjudicial deed of trust foreclosure | RCW 11.76.110 gives administration costs first priority against estate assets, so proceeds from the sale of the residence must pay administration costs before the secured creditor | RCW 11.40.135 and the deed of trust act allow a secured creditor to realize on its security independently; RCW 61.24.080 governs distribution of foreclosure proceeds and pays the secured debt first | The statute does not create a lien or super-priority; foreclosure proceeds pay the trustee’s/foreclosure costs and then the secured obligation under RCW 61.24.080 before any payment to the estate for administration costs |
| Whether probate distribution priorities displace deed of trust act distribution of foreclosure proceeds | Administration priority statute should govern distribution of decedent’s assets | Deed of trust act specifically governs distribution of nonjudicial sale proceeds and preserves secured creditor priority | Deed of trust statute governs nonjudicial sale proceeds; probate priority does not reach proceeds paid directly to secured creditor via foreclosure |
| Whether a secured creditor must present a claim in probate before foreclosing | Estate argued priorities apply in probate | Bank argued creditor need not present claim and can foreclose independent of probate (RCW 11.40.135) | Creditor may foreclose without filing a claim; probate distribution rules do not impede realization on security |
| Whether statutory construction requires express language to create liens in probate code | Estate inferred lien from payment priority language | Bank argued statutes must expressly create liens; absent express creation, no lien exists | Court held that statutes that create liens must do so expressly; RCW 11.76.110 does not expressly create a lien or super-priority |
Key Cases Cited
- Homann v. Huber, 38 Wn.2d 190 (general rule: first in time, first in right governs lien priority)
- Dean v. McFarland, 81 Wn.2d 215 (statutory liens are strictly construed; courts will not extend lien statutes beyond their text)
- Summerhill Village Homeowners Ass’n v. Roughley, 166 Wn. App. 625 (construing statute that expressly granted association lien super-priority)
- In re Trustee’s Sale of Real Property of Whitmire, 134 Wn. App. 440 (probate statutes do not generally alter secured creditor’s interest in specific property)
- In re Lundy Estate, 291 Mich. App. 347 (foreign authority rejecting probate priority over foreclosure proceeds)
