History
  • No items yet
midpage
483 S.W.3d 795
Tex. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Erika Rubio sued the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) for employment discrimination.
  • TPWD raised sovereign immunity and filed a combined plea to the jurisdiction and Rule 166a(b) motion for summary judgment.
  • TPWD’s plea alleged Rubio failed to exhaust administrative remedies and failed to timely serve TPWD under Tex. Lab. Code § 21.254; alternative relief sought dismissal or summary judgment.
  • The trial court denied summary judgment, stayed ruling on the plea to the jurisdiction, and allowed targeted jurisdictional discovery.
  • TPWD sought mandamus relief (and had filed a separate direct appeal) arguing the trial court abused its discretion by failing to promptly rule on the plea to the jurisdiction so TPWD could pursue an accelerated interlocutory appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether TPWD is entitled to mandamus to compel the trial court to rule on its plea to the jurisdiction TPWD: trial court abused its discretion by refusing to promptly rule, preventing an interlocutory appeal Rubio: trial court did not abuse discretion; no mandamus relief warranted Court: TPWD failed to show entitlement to mandamus; petition denied
Whether mandamus is appropriate given available appellate remedies TPWD: immediate ruling needed to seek accelerated interlocutory appeal; mandamus proper if trial court refuses to rule Rubio: appellate remedy may be adequate; record did not show the mandamus prerequisites satisfied Court: Relator did not meet the mandamus elements (properly filed/pending reasonable time/requested ruling/refusal to rule); mandamus denied

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124 (Tex. 2004) (mandamus standards and adequacy of appellate remedies)
  • In re Shredder Co., L.L.C., 225 S.W.3d 676 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2006) (mandamus may compel a trial court to rule on a motion pending a reasonable time)
  • In re Hearn, 137 S.W.3d 681 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2004) (elements required to obtain mandamus compelling a ruling)
  • In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d 225 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2001) (mandamus relief to force trial-court ruling on pending motion)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Texas Parks & Wildlife Department
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 10, 2016
Citations: 483 S.W.3d 795; 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 1358; 2016 WL 531956; No. 08-15-00364-CV
Docket Number: No. 08-15-00364-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
Log In
    In re Texas Parks & Wildlife Department, 483 S.W.3d 795