History
  • No items yet
midpage
in re: Tamesha T.
16 N.E.3d 763
Ill. App. Ct.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • DCFS adjudication in Cook County found six Dana children neglected and abused, with Malachi born during proceedings and placed under DCFS guardianship; disposition ordered wardship with return-home plan within 12 months.
  • DCFS involvement began after March 2012 hotline reports of neglectful conditions, including minimal clothing, dirty home, and dangerous environment; Dana pled guilty to child endangerment in April 2012 and children were temporarily removed.
  • Dana’s participation in DCFS services (homemaker, parenting classes, counseling) was inconsistent; she disappeared with the children for three weeks and later did not complete domestic violence or individual counseling.
  • Evidence admitted at the August 12, 2013 adjudication included a psychological evaluation describing cognitive deficits and risk factors, and multiple case notes showing a deteriorating home environment.
  • The circuit court found an injurious environment and a substantial risk of physical injury for all children, and concluded Dana was unable, not just unwilling, to care for them; Malachi’s case used anticipatory neglect theories.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the court abused its discretion by questioning witnesses Dana claims questioning biased the proceedings State/guardian argues questioning clarified evidence No abuse; questioning was court’s legitimate fact-finding.
Whether the neglect and abuse findings were supported by the evidence Dana argues evidence insufficient; return after endangerment plea suggests no ongoing risk State contends overwhelming evidence of injurious environment and risk Findings not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Maher, 314 Ill. App. 3d 1088 (2000) (trial court may question to elicit truth without becoming advocate)
  • In re R.S., 117 Ill. App. 3d 698 (1983) (court cannot elicit testimony to bolster State’s case against minor)
  • In re Arthur H., 212 Ill. 2d 463 (2004) (injurious environment; safe and nurturing shelter standard)
  • In re J.C., 396 Ill. App. 3d 1050 (2009) (anticipatory neglect; evidence of prior neglect admissible)
  • In re Christopher S., 364 Ill. App. 3d 76 (2006) (focus on child welfare; State bears burden by preponderance)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: in re: Tamesha T.
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Oct 1, 2014
Citation: 16 N.E.3d 763
Docket Number: 1-13-2986
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.