History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re T.P.
217 N.C. App. 181
| N.C. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • DSS filed a juvenile petition alleging Travis was neglected and dependent due to respondent's unstable living conditions.
  • Travis was adjudicated dependent on 16 November 2009 with legal custody retained by respondent but physical placement with maternal grandparents.
  • Respondent was ordered to comply with a case plan addressing stable housing, employment, and mental health treatment.
  • A 11 May 2010 review found respondent noncompliant; Travis began living with paternal grandparents on 12 June 2010 after a safety assessment and home study.
  • Permanency planning on 17 August 2010 set the plan as relative placement, custody, and guardianship; DSS efforts to reunite were relieved.
  • On 22 February 2011, with a 8 March 2011 order, the trial court granted legal and physical custody to paternal grandparents and waived further review per N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-906; respondent appeals.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Best interests standard application Respondent argues best interests not supported by facts. Court must apply best interests where parent unfitness or incompatible conduct. Best interests applied; supported by findings.
Support of findings 12, 21, 25 Findings not supported by competent evidence. Findings are supported by evidence of instability and lack of compliance. Finding 12 rejected; 21 and 25 supported.
Waiver of review hearings under § 7B-906 Waiver misapplied; requires single placement. Placement with relatives spans maternal and paternal grandparents; criteria satisfied. Waiver proper; order affirmed.
Relative placement singularity Section 7B-906 requires one relative placement. Relatives changed over time but remained within a relative placement; criteria met. Court properly construed § 7B-906 to allow multiple relatives over time.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re J.C.S., 164 N.C. App. 96, 595 S.E.2d 155 (2004) (competent evidence standard for fact findings in custody)
  • State v. Lloyd, 354 N.C. 76, 552 S.E.2d 596 (2001) (constitutional issues not waived absent trial objection)
  • In re B.G., 197 N.C. App. 570, 677 S.E.2d 549 (2009) (best interests test in parent vs nonparent custody cases)
  • Price v. Howard, 346 N.C. 68, 484 S.E.2d 528 (1997) (best interests framework for custody disputes)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re T.P.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 15, 2011
Citation: 217 N.C. App. 181
Docket Number: No. COA11-645
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.