History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re: STEPHEN WOLFEÂ
254 N.C. App. 416
| N.C. Ct. App. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Stephen Wolfe, an adjudicated incompetent with bipolar disorder, was evaluated and admitted to Mission Hospital’s inpatient psychiatric unit (Copestone) after presenting to the ER in May 2016.
  • A staff psychiatrist (Dr. Collier) submitted an evaluation recommending further inpatient treatment; the district court scheduled a review hearing under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 122C-232.
  • Wolfe had appointed counsel, denied he needed psychiatric care, and testified he would take medication if discharged; his guardian did not appear at the hearing.
  • The district court held a hearing and entered an order concurring in Wolfe’s voluntary admission and authorizing continued inpatient treatment for up to 30 days.
  • No written, signed application for Wolfe’s voluntary admission (which must be signed by a guardian for an incompetent adult) was filed or included in the court file.
  • On appeal Wolfe argued the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because the statutorily required written application initiating the § 122C-232 review hearing was never filed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the district court had subject-matter jurisdiction to concur in an incompetent adult’s voluntary admission and order continued inpatient treatment when no written guardian-signed application was filed to initiate the § 122C-232 hearing Wolfe: jurisdiction never vested because the statute requires the guardian-signed written application to initiate the review hearing State: court proceeded on physician’s evaluation and conducted the hearing; implied argument that proceeding without the written application was permissible Court: Jurisdiction did not vest; absence of the required guardian-signed written application deprived the court of authority, so the order was vacated

Key Cases Cited

  • In re T.R.P., 360 N.C. 588 (2006) (a court’s order is void where jurisdiction never vested due to defective statutorily required initiating pleading)
  • In re Ingram, 74 N.C. App. 579 (1985) (vacating commitment order where initiating petition lacked required affidavit)
  • Burgess v. Gibbs, 262 N.C. 462 (1964) (proceedings without subject-matter jurisdiction are a nullity)
  • State v. Felmet, 302 N.C. 173 (1981) (when record shows lack of jurisdiction, appellate court should vacate orders entered without authority)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re: STEPHEN WOLFEÂ
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Jul 18, 2017
Citation: 254 N.C. App. 416
Docket Number: COA16-1217
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.