History
  • No items yet
midpage
774 F. Supp. 2d 584
S.D.N.Y.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Securities Act claims alleging misstatements in Yield Plus Fund offering documents (Sections 11, 12(a)(2), 15).
  • SAC alleged misrepresentations about fund holdings, investment objectives, liquidity, and quality of debt securities, including mortgage-related assets and subprime exposure.
  • Two prior opinions narrowed/focused issues: miscategorization of mortgage-backed securities (percentages) and overstatement of asset values; some claims were previously dismissed or left for amendment.
  • Court concluded at this stage that loss causation must be proven under Sections 11/12(a)(2) and that the statute’s framework ties damages to depreciation in NAV caused by concealment-related risk.
  • Defendants argued NAV, not market price, is the mechanism for mutual funds, so misstatements could not cause loss causation; plaintiff proposed alternatives like concealment of non-diversification risk or a ‘run on the fund.’
  • Court held that loss causation was facially negated by the plaintiffs’ theory under the statutory framework and dismissed the SAC with prejudice.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether loss causation is pleaded for Sections 11/12(a)(2). Yu argued the concealed risks from non-diversification and illiquidity caused NAV declines and investor redemptions. State Street argued NAV cannot be inflated by misstatements and declines were due to market forces, not concealment. Yes; but loss causation was facially negative and claims dismissed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo, 544 U.S. 336 (U.S. 2005) (loss causation framework; corrective-disclosure paradigm)
  • Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 396 F.3d 161 (2d Cir. 2005) (two-prong loss causation; forecast of concealed risk; materialization required)
  • In re Morgan Stanley Information Fund Securities Litigation, 592 F.3d 347 (2d Cir. 2010) (loss causation in mutual fund context; loss caused by depreciation in NAV)
  • In re Charles Schwab Corp. Securities Litigation, 257 F.R.D. 534 (N.D. Cal. 2009) (court accepted alternative theories of loss causation beyond corrective disclosure)
  • In re Salomon Smith Barney Mutual Fund Fees Litigation, 441 F. Supp. 2d 579 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (loss causation evaluation in mutual fund claims)
  • In re IAC/InterActiveCorp, 478 F. Supp. 2d 574 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (court consideration of loss causation framework and applicable standards)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re State Street Bank and Trust Co. Fixed Income
Court Name: District Court, S.D. New York
Date Published: Mar 31, 2011
Citations: 774 F. Supp. 2d 584; MDL No. 1945, 08 Civ. 8235 (RJH)
Docket Number: MDL No. 1945, 08 Civ. 8235 (RJH)
Court Abbreviation: S.D.N.Y.
Log In
    In Re State Street Bank and Trust Co. Fixed Income, 774 F. Supp. 2d 584